Description
“… what was said in Hatton was not intended to cover all the infinitely variable facts that are likely to arise in stress at work cases.”
Hartman v South Essex Mental Health and Community Care NHS Trust [2005] IRLR 293 at 299 (judgement of the court)
Is the law on “stress at work” yet certain enough for employers to understand their duty to employees?
Write a maximum of 3,500 words (excludes bibliography)
The post Describe what was said in Hatton was not intended to cover all the infinitely variable facts that are likely to arise in stress at work cases. appeared first on Essay Quoll.