1 NURS2006 _Assignment 2 Marking Rubric |2020
NURS 2006/: Clinical Governance.
Assessment 3: Marking Rubric: (35%, equivalent of 2500 words)
| Criteria | High Distinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass | Fail |
| Structure and writing style 15% Introduces the topic and states aims of the poster. The format of the presentation is structured in a logical sequence so that the content flows Fulfils the technical aspects of the task. Creative flair in layout; impressive use of colours’ Succinctly expressed insightful and original thought using exemplary poster presentation skills |
|||||
| Structure and Writing style (5%) |
Very well-structured with all components present as outlined in assessment details. Systematically and logically organised. Flawless grammar, spelling and sentence structure The overall paper, from introduction to conclusion, flows extremely well Adheres to word count +/- 10% |
Clear structure which enhances the discussion and argument Systematically and logically organised. Excellent grammar, spelling and sentence structure Adheres to word count +/- 10% |
Generally well-structured with all components present as outlined in assessment details. Evidence of systematic organisation of content. Adheres to word count +/- 10% |
Adequately structured as outlined in assessment details but one or two components need further development. Structures may make it difficult to read, but it adequately communicates information. Problems evident with grammar, spelling, and sentence structure but the paper is mostly easy to read Adheres to word count +/- 10% |
Inadequate structure as outlined in assessment details with poor organisation of components. No clear flow, rambling, repetitive, difficult to read and to understand the meaning. Includes significant errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax, so the intent of the paper is difficult to determine. Over/under the word limit (- /+10%) |
| Visual Presentation (10%) |
Presents a comprehensive knowledge translation poster. The poster is exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness. |
Presents a clear and concise knowledge translation poster. The poster is very appealing in terms of design, layout, and neatness Graphics are engaging and enhance the text content is clearly arranged so that the viewer can understand order without narration |
The poster is appealing in terms of design, layout, and neatness Graphics enhance the text content is arranged so that the viewer can understand order without narration |
Some elements of the poster are appealing in terms of design, layout, and neatness Visual appeal is adequate; somewhat cluttered; colors and patterns detract from readability Graphics, adequately enhance the text |
Not very visually appealing; cluttered; colors and patterns hinder readability Use of font sizes/variations to facilitate the organization, presentation, and readability of the research is inconsistent/distracting Graphics (e.g., tables, figures, etc.) do not enhance the text |
2 NURS2006 _Assignment 2 Marking Rubric |2020
| Content & Critical analyses (80%) The presentation has covered the topic sufficiently. The presentation content has clear links to a clinical problem at a healthcare setting. Has a depth of understanding of the topic and associated significant issues The presentation demonstrates a high degree of critical thought and insight by providing justification/rationale for the discussion |
|||||
| Content | The poster includes all required elements as well as additional information. Rich in content. Full of critical and evidence-based thought, insight and analysis. Demonstrates exemplary critical analysis, synthesis of information and original thought in the identification of highly relevant research articles. |
Student can accurately answer all questions related to facts in the poster and processes used to create the poster. Shows thorough knowledge and understanding of the chosen topic is evident. |
Student can accurately answer most questions related to facts in the poster and processes used to create the poster. Shows evidence of relevant and sound knowledge and understanding of the topic. |
Student can accurately answer about 75% of questions related to facts in the poster and processes used to create the poster Shows basic knowledge of the topic but not a thorough understanding of some key concepts. |
Student appears to have insufficient knowledge about the facts or processes used in the poster. Demonstrates limited knowledge and understanding of some key concepts. Several required elements were missing. |
| Referencing The referencing style used throughout the paper is congruent with the College of Nursing and Health Sciences The reference list is accurate (ie no missing page numbers, volumes, correct title etc), complete (ie no reference is the body of the paper are missing from the reference list) and consistent. The references cited are contemporary (ie less than 10 years old unless seminal paper) Primary references are used predominantly (ie the original reference has been sited rather than a secondary source) There is evidence in the paper that the student has searched widely for information related to the topic/ issues The student has acknowledged all the sources of information Direct quotations are only used to make crucial points or to support the discussion/ argument |
|||||
| Referencing (5%) | Located, evaluated, and synthesised highly relevant information from quality peer reviewed, relevant, and current evidence sources. Accurately and consistently adhered to APA (6th) referencing conventions in both in text referencing and the reference list with no errors. |
Located, evaluated, and synthesised relevant information from peer reviewed, relevant, and current evidence sources. Clear evidence of wide and relevant reading. Almost always accurately and consistently adhered to APA (6th) referencing conventions in both in text referencing and the reference list. |
Located, evaluated, and incorporated a range of quality peer reviewed, relevant, and current evidence sources. Accurately adhered to APA (6th) referencing conventions in both in text referencing and the reference list. |
Located and collated partly relevant information from the topic and current evidence sources. Attempt made to adhere to APA (6th) referencing conventions in both in text referencing and the reference list, but some referencing omissions or inaccuracies noted. |
Frequent errors in APA (6th) referencing style for reference list and in text referencing Substantial lack and Inadequate use of quality peer reviewed, relevant, and current evidence sources. |
| Overall comment | |||||
| Name of marker | Date | Grade |
The post NURS2006 _Assignment 2 Marking Rubric appeared first on My Assignment Online.
