Competency
Analyze the evolution of social media standards and practices and how it relates to the potential need for regulation of social media, along with ethical concerns.
Instructions
Many people get all or most of their news from social media. For this project, we are going to be analyzing the content of several social media sites from major news sources, paying particular attention to social media standards, practices, and regulation.
Where do you get your news? Start by going to one major news site’s FACEBOOK page (CNN, MSNBC, FOX, etc.) Try another different news site’s TWITTER feed, and third choose another social media site such as Reddit, Pinterest, or another (preferably one you use, if there is one).
Analyze the sites in a 3-5 page total paper. In your analysis, be sure to include the following:
- General introduction to your thoughts on the social media you studied
- Several social media practices you observed (e.g., what gets the most interaction?)
- Examples of regulation of social media and discussion of such regulation (Is it good, bad, or indifferent? How could circumstances change the situation?)
- Analysis of ethical concerns (e.g., can you see examples of bias?)
- What is the culture of each site – how do users seem to respond to questionable items? (Is racism or open mocking ignored or pursued?)
- Conclusion of your findings
I need this paper revised. it wasn’t done properly. Below is the feedback from thee instructor. i need all of the areas to be passing.
NEEDS FIXED Introduction: 1 No Pass
You failed to provide a general introduction into which 3 news outlets on which 3 social media sites you reviewed and were sharing your general thoughts on. For instance,
Fox News on Facebook, CNN on Instagram, and MSNBC on Twitter
(these are examples which would show you will share information in your paper about 3 news outlets on 3 different social media platforms.)
NEEDS REVISED Social Media Practices: 2 Competence
You briefly mentioned general categories of interactions. What is getting the most interaction on the news outlet’s social media platforms specifically?
Be sure to identify and thoroughly analyze several social media practices from each of the news outlet’s sites
NEEDS REVISED Regulation: 2 Competence
You gave examples of regulation, in general. But, what regulation are for the news site’s platforms? Facebook requires users to be 13 years old. What about fake profiles? What about the pictures allowed on Instagram? What are the terms and conditions? Be specific with several (3 or more) good examples of social media regulation and an insightful analysis of impact.
Are they good? Bad? Indifferent? How could circumstances change the situation of regulation?
NEEDS FIXED Ethical Concerns: 1 No Pass
You failed to analyze ethical concerns for the news sites themselves. You don’t believe any of the news sites show bias? Be sure to share several (3 or more) ethical concerns and analyze them thoroughly.
NEEDS FIXED Culture: 1 No pass
You failed to identify specific users’ responses to questionable items on a page. In order to move to mastery, you should thoughtfully and completely consider the culture of each site (the 3 separate news outlets on separate social media platforms) such as is racism or open mocking of other’s views ignored or stopped? How do users respond to questionable items posted? Do they shame posts that are unacceptable?
NEEDS REVISED Conclusion: 2 Competence
You gave a bit of a conclusion. In order to move to mastery be sure to be thorough and insightful when summing up the information from the news outlets social media sites.
Running head: SOCIAL MEDIA SITES 1
SOCIAL MEDIA SITES 6
An Analysis of Social Media News Platforms and Sites
Keri King
12/08/2020
An Analysis of Social Media News Platforms and Sites
Thoughts on the Social Media Platform(s) Studied
The social media platforms I studied are Facebook and Twitter, on which leading media companies have accounts. The media firms post news updates, which can be accessed by subscribers and followers (Muise et al., 2009). Although the two sites suffice for sharing information, they have significantly different uses. Facebook, in my view, includes casual engagements and the portrayal of personal lives through practices such as posting updates of photos. Twitter, on the other hand, involves more official engagements with subscribers posting informative and somewhat educative content. In the context of Twitter, hardly do people post photos of private life in a bid to attract comments and likes. News media, however, register accounts on both Facebook and Twitter due to the fact that both platforms have numerous users, who represent the target audience.
The Practices Observed
In the course of visiting the sites, I made multiple observations, one of which is information types that receive widespread user attention. In this case, my observation was that information that related to crimes received widespread attention. The indicator of increased attention, in the case of Facebook, was the number of likes and comments that people made to news posts that involved crime. Therein, users even resort to sharing the information on crime until it reaches the agencies that are charged with responding to such occurrences. The other information category that I realized receives widespread attention is that which relates to celebrities. In the context, whenever the media house posted information regarding celebrities, regardless of the topic, subscribers that either identify with the artist or disapprove their conduct would make numerous comments. The other category of news that receives exceptionally high attention levels is politics. In the case, my observation is that the users perpetuate political debates on account of holding differing political views, whereby some users will support an assertion made, while others will oppose it. An unwarranted situation in such cases, however, is that the platforms exhibit considerably high levels of a lack of control in that it is commonplace for people to hurl insults against others or make derogatory statements against a group of people (Mehdizadeh, 2010). Some other news categories do not receive high attention levels, a common example therein being religious content. The only exception is when the religious content posted presents the potential for people to hold sides, thus, engage in a debate or heated exchange of words. On response to religious updates, I observed that women have a predisposition to respond to religious content when compared to men. An observation that is specific to twitter sites is that responses to content involve a great deal of professionalism and decorum with little or no cases of insults or character assassination.
Regulations
The sites involve some form of regulation that guides the activities that one may engage in on the platforms. A regulation that I noted is reporting content that is believed to be obscene to the support team. The mode of regulation applies to content posted on the platforms or derogative comments posted in response to some updates. In the context, the support team examines the content that it receives complaints against to consider whether to block it from access by viewers (Phua et al., 2017). If they consider the complaint to be valid, the support team blocks the content and censures the user that posted such content. The approach may seem to be effective for the control of malicious use activities on the platforms. My view, however, is that a more effective approach may be essential in the context for the censoring of content before it is viewed by other users.
An Analysis of Ethical Concerns
A remarkable attribute of the sites and platforms is that they do not exhibit any bias tendencies. As an illustration, all users and subscribers to a news feed have equal opportunities to view the content posted by a media house without the potential for discrimination. In like manner, the subscribers have equal opportunities to respond to the content that is posted by the media houses. Furthermore, all media companies, regardless, of regional background enjoy unlimited access to the sites as well as interactions with their target audience. Conversely, no form of patronage exists as no users are considered superior to others.
Culture of the Respective Sites
As mentioned previously, Twitter and Facebook exhibit different cultures. In terms of response to content that is considered inappropriate by a user, Facebook users tend to lose objectivity and support the users that they have common characteristics with. Such is the case for political posts and racial sentiments that a group of people may raise complaints against. The users, however, unite to rebuke obscene posts, examples of which are nudes, where morality appears to override political and cultural affiliations (Phua et al., 2017). Mockery, however, appears to be the order of the day on Facebook. Turning to Twitter, users exhibit a great deal of objectivity in response to the content that is highlighted as being inappropriate. The objectivity, however, does not mean the absence of criticism and open mockery based on an individual’s views. In the case of undisputed vices such as racism, however, users unite against the perpetrators in calling for action.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Twitter and Facebook are two social media platforms that media companies employ to reach the intended audiences. The two platforms, however, exhibit some differences regarding users therein. As an illustration, Twitter users exhibit professionalism, while Facebook involves a great deal of casual interactions. The content that users respond to, in significantly high numbers, include politics, crime, and information on celebrities, while religious content receives the least attention. The regulation approach used therein is that of reporting users and content that is considered inappropriate to the support team. A commendable attribute of the platforms is that they do not involve any biases against users, both individuals, and firms.
References
Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and social networking, 13(4), 357-364.
Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy?. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 441-444.
Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. J. (2017). Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to follow brands: The moderating effect of social comparison, trust, tie strength, and network homophily on brand identification, brand engagement, brand commitment, and membership intention. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 412-424.
Get Professional Assignment Help Cheaply
Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?
Whichever your reason may is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.
Our essay writers are graduates with diplomas, bachelor’s, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college diploma. When assigning your order, we match the paper subject with the area of specialization of the writer.
Why Choose Our Academic Writing Service?
- Plagiarism free papers
- Timely delivery
- Any deadline
- Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
- Subject-relevant academic writer
- Adherence to paper instructions
- Ability to tackle bulk assignments
- Reasonable prices
- 24/7 Customer Support
- Get superb grades consistently
How It Works
1. Place an order
You fill all the paper instructions in the order form. Make sure you include all the helpful materials so that our academic writers can deliver the perfect paper. It will also help to eliminate unnecessary revisions.
2. Pay for the order
Proceed to pay for the paper so that it can be assigned to one of our expert academic writers. The paper subject is matched with the writer’s area of specialization.
3. Track the progress
You communicate with the writer and know about the progress of the paper. The client can ask the writer for drafts of the paper. The client can upload extra material and include additional instructions from the lecturer. Receive a paper.
4. Download the paper
The paper is sent to your email and uploaded to your personal account. You also get a plagiarism report attached to your paper.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH GRADE VALLEY TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
