For faster services, inquiry about  new assignments submission or  follow ups on your assignments please text us/call us on +1 (251) 265-5102

WhatsApp Widget

MIS608 – Agile Project Management

MIS608_Assessment_1_Brief_Research Report_Module 2.2 Page 1 of 5
Task Summary
You are required to write an individual research report of 1500 words to demonstrate your
understanding of the origins and foundations of Agile by addressing the following areas:
1. The origins of Agile – why did Agile emerge, what was it in response to, and how did this
lead to the values and principles as outlined in the agile manifesto?
2. The origins of Lean and how it has influenced Agile practice
3. The similarities and differences between Scrum and Kanban as work methods
4. Why adopting Agile benefits an organisation
Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task.
Context
Organisations are increasingly using Agile as a project management approach to achieve their goals
and objectives efficiently. While agile is predominantly used in software development, there are
elements of agile that can be applied to achieving goals and objectives in many areas of an
organisation. Understanding these concepts will be vital for you to progress in this subject. This
knowledge will not only support your completion of the final group assignment, but also will assist
you in managing your progress in the group project by using Agile techniques to communicate
capacity and offer full transparency of work across the team.
Task Instructions
1. Write a 1500 words research report to demonstrate your understanding of the origins and
foundations of Agile by addressing the following areas:
• The origins of Agile – why did Agile emerge, what was it in response to, and how did this
lead to the values and principles as outlined in the agile manifesto?
• The origins of Lean and how it has influenced Agile practice.
• The similarities and differences between Scrum and Kanban as work methods.

ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MIS608 – Agile Project Management
Assessment Research Report on Agile
Individual/Group Individual
Length 1500 words (+/- 10%)
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful
completion of the task below include:
a) Undertake research to demonstrate an understanding of
Agile concepts, tools and techniques.
Submission Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 2.2
Weighting 25%
Total Marks 100 marks

MIS608_Assessment_1_Brief_Research Report_Module 2.2 Page 2 of 5
• Why adopting Agile benefits an organisation.
2. Review your subject notes to establish the relevant area of investigation that applies to the
case. Perform additional research in the area of investigation and select FIVE (5) additional
sources which will add value to your report in the relevant area of investigation.
3. Plan how you will structure your ideas for the report. Write a report plan before you start
writing. The report should be 1500 words. Therefore, it does not require an executive
summary nor an abstract.
4. The report should consist of the following structure:
A title page with subject code and name, assignment title, student’s name, student number,
and lecturer’s name.
The introduction (100 – 150 words) that will also serve as your statement of purpose for the
report—this means that you will tell the reader what you are going to cover in your report.
You will need to inform the reader of:
a. Your area of research and its context
b. The key concepts you will be addressing
c. What the reader can expect to find in the body of the report
The body of the report (1200-1300 words) will need to cover four specific areas:
a) Why did Agile originate? When did it emerge and what was it in response to? How
did this lead to the four values and 12 principles that are outline by the agile
manifesto?
b) Where did Lean originate? Briefly define what Lean is and two Lean philosophies
have been adopted in the evolution of Agile practice?
c) Scrum and Kanban have many similarities, but also key differences. Compare and
contrast Scrum and Kanban with each other, illustrating these similarities and
differences with examples.
d) Explain what value adopting Agile can offer to an organisation.
The conclusion (100-150 words) will summarise any findings or recommendations that the
report puts forward regarding the concepts covered in the report.
5. Format of the report
The report should use font Arial or Calibri 11 point, be line spaced at 1.5 for ease of reading,
and have page numbers on the bottom of each page. If diagrams or tables are used, due
attention should be given to pagination to avoid loss of meaning and continuity by
unnecessarily splitting information over two pages. Diagrams must carry the appropriate
captioning.
6. Referencing
There are requirements for referencing this report using APA referencing style. It is expected
that you reference any lecture notes used and five additional sources in the relevant subject
area based on readings and further research.
It is essential that you use the appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research.
Please see more information on referencing here:
https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool
MIS608_Assessment_1_Brief_Research Report_Module 2.2 Page 3 of 5
7. You are strongly advised to read the rubric, which is an evaluation guide with criteria for
grading the assignment—this will give you a clear picture of what a successful report looks
like.
Submission Instructions
Submit Assessment 1 via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MIS608 Agile Project
Management. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal.
Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Academic Integrity Declaration
I declare that except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is
my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy
and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms
I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so
accordingly.
MIS608_Assessment_1_Brief_Research Report_Module 2.2 Page 4 of 5
Assessment Rubric

Assessment
Attributes
Fail
(Yet to achieve
minimum standard)
0–49%
Pass
(Functional)
50–64%
Credit
(Proficient)
65–74%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75–84%
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85–100%
Visual appeal and
presentation of content
Title page included.
Adheres to the font,
spacing, format, and
word count
requirement.
Appropriate use of
paragraphs, sentence
construction, spelling,
and grammar.
20%
No title page. Incorrect
font and size with poor
line spacing and large
gaps in pagination, tables,
or diagrams. Report is
written as a block of text
with no breaks in between
ideas. Separate ideas
cannot be clearly
discerned. Many errors in
spelling or grammar. Does
not adhere to the word
count requirement.
Title page is included. Missing
most information. Incorrect
font and size is used or poor
line spacing and large gaps in
pagination. Paragraphs are
used but large blocks of text
with long sentences make it
difficult to understand the
ideas being conveyed.
Spelling or grammar has
errors but meaning remains
clear. Does not adhere to the
word count requirement.
Title page is included but is
missing key information.
Some errors in font use and
line spacing. Some
pagination problems. One
idea or concept per
paragraph. Some
paragraphs could be more
succinctly written. Minor
spelling or grammar errors.
Adheres to the word count
requirement.
Title page is included with
most required information.
Minor errors in font,
spacing and format. One
idea or concept per
paragraph with 3–4 well
constructed sentences per
paragraph. No errors in
spelling or grammar.
Adheres to the word count
requirement.
Title page is included with
all required information.
Font, spacing, and format
are in accordance with the
requirements of the
assignment brief. Expert
use of paragraphs with 3–4
well-constructed sentences
per paragraph that follow
logically from each other.
No errors in spelling or
grammar. Adheres to the
word count requirement
Knowledge and
understanding
Understanding of the
origins of agile, and its
principles and values.
The case for an
organisation in
adopting agile.
Differences and
similarities between
Lack of understanding of
the required concepts and
knowledge. Key
components of the
assignment are not
addressed. Lack of
application and analysis of
information to provide
clear recommendations.
Limited understanding of
required concepts and
knowledge. Some of the key
components of the
assignment are not
addressed. Limited
application and analysis to
provide clear
recommendations.
Adequate knowledge or
understanding of the
required concepts. A
reasonable capacity to
explain and apply relevant
key concepts. Supports
opinion and information
substantiated by evidence
from research to provide
recommendations.
Thorough understanding of
the key concepts.
Discriminates between
assertion of opinion and
information substantiated
by robust evidence from
the research/course
materials and extended
reading. Well
demonstrated capacity to
apply and analyse relevant
information to provide clear
recommendations.
Highly developed
understanding of the field
or discipline/s.
Systematically and critically
discriminates between
assertion of opinion and
information substantiated
by robust evidence from
the research/course
materials and extended
reading. Recommendations
are clearly justified based

MIS608_Assessment_1_Brief_Research Report_Module 2.2 Page 5 of 5

Scrum and Kanban as
work methods
50%
on the application and
analysis of information.
Use of academic and
discipline conventions
Formal tone. No use of
first-party perspective.
Meets the assignment
brief regarding
introduction, body, and
conclusion.
Appropriate use of
credible resources.
Correct citation of key
resources using APA
style of referencing.
30%
Poorly written with
informal tone using first
person pronouns (I, my,
we, me, us). No
introduction and
conclusion attempted.
Demonstrates
inconsistent and
inadequate use of good
quality, credible, and
relevant resources to
support and develop
ideas. No use of in-text
references, or no
reference list at the close
of the report. There are
many mistakes in using
the APA style.
Minor errors in the use of
first-person pronouns (I, my,
we, me, us). Introduction
attempted but very generic,
and does not clearly state the
purpose of the report and
what the reader should
expect to find in the body of
the report. Conclusion
attempted but does not
include summation of key
concepts discussed in the
report and/or key conclusions
or recommendations.
Demonstrates consistent use
of credible and relevant
research sources to support
and develop ideas, but these
are not always explicit or
well-developed. Little use of
in-text referencing, or
inadequate references
consulted and added to
references at the close of the
report. There are some
mistakes in using APA style.
Written according to
academic genre. Sound use
of the introduction but
does not clearly state either
the purpose of the report
or what the reader should
expect to find in the body
of the report. Sound use of
the conclusion and
succeeds in either the
summation of key concepts
discussed, or key
conclusions or
recommendations, but not
both.
Demonstrates consistent
use of credible and relevant
research sources to support
and develop ideas. Good
use of in-text referencing
and appropriate number of
references. There are only
minor errors in using the
APA style.
Well-written and adheres to
the academic genre. Good
use of the introduction,
which clearly states the
purpose of the report and
what the reader should
expect to find in the body
of the report. Good use of
the conclusion and
succeeds in summation of
key concepts discussed and
key conclusions or
recommendations.
Consistently demonstrates
expert use of good quality,
credible, and relevant
research sources to support
and develop appropriate
arguments and statements.
Shows evidence of reading
beyond the key reading.
Very good use of in-text
referencing. There are no
mistakes in using the APA
style.
Expertly written. Excellent
use of introduction, which
secures the attention of the
reader, clearly states the
purpose of the report and
what the reader should
expect to find in the body
of the report.
Excellent use of the
conclusion, which succeeds
in confident summation of
key concepts and
conclusions and gives the
reader a clear sense of next
steps required. Expert use
of high-quality credible
research sources to support
and develop arguments and
position statements. Shows
extensive evidence of
reading beyond the key
reading. Excellent and
meticulous use of in-text
referencing. There are no
mistakes in using the APA
style.

The post MIS608 – Agile Project Management appeared first on My Assignment Online.

WhatsApp
Hello! Need help with your assignments?

For faster services, inquiry about  new assignments submission or  follow ups on your assignments please text us/call us on +1 (251) 265-5102

Submit Your Questions to Writers for FREE!!

X
GET YOUR PAPER DONE