Plausible Scenarios and Observations - The Complete Academic Support Hub

Criteria	HD	DN	CR	PP	NN
Criterion 1: Case study: Plausible Scenarios and Observations* (20%)	The links between presentation, all symptoms and observations are consistent for all scenarios**.	The links between presentation, symptoms and observations are nearly always consistent across scenarios.	The links between presentation, symptoms and observations are mostly consistent across scenarios.	A number of inconsistencies evident in the links between presentation, symptoms and observations across scenarios.	Illogical links between presentation, symptoms, and observations for most or all scenarios.
Criterion 2: MCQ items: Demonstrates deep understanding of clinical problems through well-thought out Questions, Keys and Distractors (30%)	All items** include questions that are logical, have a definite key and have well-thought out, challenging distractors.	Most items include questions that are logical, have a definite key and have well-thought out, challenging distractors.	Some weaknesses evident in several items.	Significant weaknesses in several items.	Significant weaknesses in most items.
Criterion 3: Explanations: Understanding of the principles related to assessment and management of a deteriorating patient using evidence-based literature (EBL) (40%)	Exceptional understanding demonstrated through all explanations. Extensive reference to EBL.	Comprehensive understanding demonstrated through all explanations. Strong reference to EBL.	Reasonable understanding demonstrated through most explanations. Good reference to EBL.	Satisfactory understanding demonstrated through most items. Satisfactory reference to EBL for most explanations.	Inadequate understanding demonstrated through explanations. Inadequate reference to EBP.
Criterion 4: Technical aspects: Communicates effectively and references correctly using the Harvard Referencing system (10%)	Has no grammatical or spelling errors. No inconsistencies in reference list or in-text. Below word limit.	Has minimal grammatical or spelling errors. Minimal inconsistencies in reference list or in-text. Below word limit.	Has some grammatical or spelling errors and/or some inconsistencies in reference list or in-text and/or below word limit.	Has regular grammatical or spelling errors and/or some inconsistencies in reference list or in-text and/or over word count.	Evidence of plagiarism or inconsistent in-text referencing and reference list and regular grammatical and spelling errors.