For faster services, inquiry about  new assignments submission or  follow ups on your assignments please text us/call us on +1 (251) 265-5102

WhatsApp Widget

LEMT305 LeadershipforManagers

Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 1 of 3 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
ASSESSMENT BRIEF – 4

COURSE: BachelorofBusiness/BachelorofAccounting
Unit Code: LEMT305
UnitTitle: LeadershipforManagers
Type ofAssessment: Comprehensivecasestudy
Length/Duration: SelfReflectiveSummary– 2500 words
UnitLearningOutcomes
addressed:
1.Understandtheconceptsandtheoriesofleadership.
2.Identifyvariousleadershipstyles.
3.Identifytheimportanceofleadershipqualitiesformanagers.
4.Understandhowleadershipisappliedinpracticeinteamsandinanorganisation.
5.Enhanceskillstodevelopleadershipinanorganisation.
6.Chooseaneffectiveandethicalleadershipstyleinaworkenvironment.
7. Demonstrateacohesiveknowledgeoftheconceptsandtheoriesofleadership
SubmissionDate: Week14
AssessmentTask: Comprehensivecasestudyanalysis
TotalMark: 40marks
Weighting: 40%
Studentsareadvisedthat submission ofanAssessmentTask pasttheduedate withoutaformallysigned
approvedAssignmentExtension Form(KentWebsiteMyKent Student Link>FORM–AssignmentExtension
ApplicationForm–StudentLoginRequired)or previouslyapprovedapplicationforother extenuating
circumstances impactingcourseofstudy, incurs a5%penaltyper calendar day,
calculatedbydeductionfromthetotalmark.
Forexample.AnAssessmentTaskmarkedoutof40willincura2 markpenaltyforeachcalendarday.
Moreinformation,pleasereferto(KentWebsiteMyKent Student Link>POLICY – AssessmentPolicy&
Procedures– StudentLoginRequired)

Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 2 of 3 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION:
Your final assessment is an individual written assignment of approx 2,500 words as per the following description:
Students are required to answer questions based on two comprehensive case studies. Word limit of each case
study is 1,250 words. These case studies will be uploaded on the Moodle site in week 10 along with the guidelines
to attempt it.
ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION:
The final assessment for all students is due at 11.59 pm on Sunday of Week 14.
The assignment must be submitted online in Moodle. All materials must be submitted electronically in Microsoft
Word format (other formats e.g., pdf or mac file may not be readable by markers). No paper-based or hardcopy
submission will be accepted.
Please note that this is an individual assessment and any similarity score greater than 20% will be treated as
academic misconduct.
No referencing of sources is required for either part of this final assessment.
MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC): 40%

Marking
Criteria.
Fail(0-9.9) Pass(10-12.5) Credit(13-14.5) Distinction(15-16.5) HighDistinction(17-
20)
Research
10 Marks
Littleevidenceof
research.
Sourcesare
missing,
Inappropriate,
poorlyintegrated
orlacking
credibility.Lacks
clearlinkof
sourceswith
essay
Textbookand4other
relevantpeerreviewed
sources.Basicuseof
sourcestosupport
ideas,generallywell
integrated,mostsources
arecredible.Maybe
weaknesseswith
paraphrasingor
integration/application
Researchis
generallythorough.
Gooduseofsources
tosupportideas,
mostlywell
integrated,sources
arecredible.May
beweaknesseswith
paraphrasingor
integration/
application.
Thoroughresearchis
indicated. Verygood
useofsourcesto
supportideas,well
integrated,sourcesare
credible.Maybeminor
weaknesseswith
paraphrasingor
integration/application.
Thoroughresearchis
indicated. Professional
useofsourcestosupport
ideas,well integrated,
sourcesarecredible.Very
minor,ifany,weaknesses
withparaphrasing
integration/application.
Information/
Content
10 Marks
Reportlacks
coherence;topic
ispoorly
addressed;little
analysis.
Reportisgenerally
coherent;topicis
addressed;analysesin
reasonabledepthwith
somedescription.There
aresomeinconsistencies
andweaknesseswith
flow.
Reportiscoherent
andflowswell;
topicisaddressed
quitethoroughly;
analysesin
considerabledepth.
Theremaybesome
inconsistenciesand
weaknesseswith
flow.
Reportisverycoherent
andflowswell;topicis
addressedthoroughly;
analysesindepth.
Theremaybeminor
inconsistenciesand
weaknesswithflow.
Professionalwork.Report
is verycoherentandflows
well;topicisaddressed
thoroughly;analysesin
greatdepth.Veryminor,if
any,inconsistenciesand
weaknesseswithflow.
Structure
10 Marks
Topic,concepts
arenotclearin
introduction.
Materialinthe
bodyisgenerally
poorlysequenced.
Nodiscernible
conclusion;no
linksto
introduction.
Topic,conceptsare
generallystatedwith
someclarityin
introduction. Material in
bodyisgenerally
logicallysequenced;
someweaknesses.
Conclusiondoesnot
clearly summarise
report,linksto
introductionarenot
clear.
Topic,conceptsare
moderately
outlinedin
introduction.
Materialinbodyis
logicallyand
broadlysequenced;
withsomeminor
weaknesses.
Conclusionbroadly
summarisesreport
with
recommendations
andbroadlylinksto
introduction.
Topic,conceptsare
clearlyoutlinedin
introduction. Material
inbodyislogicallyand
clearlysequenced;very
feworminor
weaknesses.
Conclusionmostly
effectivelysummarises
reportwith
recommendationsand
clearlinksto
introduction.
Topic,conceptsareclearly
outlinedinintroduction.
Materialinbodyis
logicallyandclearly
sequenced;veryminor,if
any,weaknesses.
Conclusioneffectively
summarisesreportwith
recommendationsand
clearlinkstointroduction.
Language/
Presentation/
5Marks
Referencing
5marks
Total10marks
Poorstandardof
writing.Word
limitmaynotbe
adheredto.Noor
minimalreference
list,mixedstyles.
Maximum1000words
Basicandsound
standardofwriting;
someerrorsin
punctuation,grammar
andspelling.Reference
listisgenerallycomplete
with1or2references
missing.
Goodstandardof
writing;fewerrors
in punctuation,
grammarand
spelling.Few
inaccuraciesin
referencelistandall
referenceslisted.
Verygoodstandardof
writing;veryfewor
minorerrorsin
punctuation,grammar
andspelling.Thorough
andconsistent
referencelistandall
referenceslisted.
Professionalstandardof
writing;noerrorsin
punctuation,grammar
andspelling.Professional
level ofreferencingand
acknowledgment;no
errorsofstyleevident.

Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 3 of 3 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT TASKS [NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT]
Content for Assessment Task papers should incorporate a formal introduction, main points and conclusion.
Appropriate academic writing and referencing are inevitable academic skills that you must develop and
demonstrate in work being presented for assessment. The content of high quality work presented by a student
must be fully referenced within-text citations and a Reference List at the end. Kent strongly recommends you
refer to the Academic Learning Support Workshop materials available on the Kent Learning Management System
(Moodle). For details please click the link http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606
and download the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Site is the location for Workbooks
and information that are presented to Kent Students in the ALS Workshops conducted at the beginning of each
Trimester.
Kent recommends a minimum of FIVE (5) references in work being presented for assessment. Unless otherwise
specifically instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed in the Unit Outline for the specific Assessment Task, any
paper with less than five (5) references may be deemed not meeting a satisfactory standard and possibly be
failed.
Content in Assessment tasks that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the “Harvard
Referencing Workbook” will be penalised.
Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count if this is specifically stated for the Assessment Task
in the Unit Outline. As a general rule there is an allowable discretionary variance to the word count in that it is
generally accepted that a student may go over or under by 10% than the stated length.
GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCING [NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT]
References are assessed for their quality. Students should draw on quality academic sources, such as books,
chapters from edited books, journals etc. The textbook for the Unit of study can be used as a reference, but not
the Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will want to see evidence that a student is capable of conducting their own
research. Also, in order to help Assessors determine a student’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-text
references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number(s) if shown in the original.
Before preparing your Assessment Task or own contribution, please review this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding
Plagiarism through Referencing) by clicking on the following link: link:
http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606
A search for peer-reviewed journal articles may also assist students. These type of journal articles can be located
in the online journal databases and can be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, online
dictionaries and online encyclopaedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic, but
should not be over-used – these should constitute no more than 10% of your total list of references/sources.
Additional information and literature can be used where these are produced by legitimate sources, such as
government departments, research institutes such as the National Health and Medical Research Council
(NHMRC), or international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). Legitimate organisations
and government departments produce peer reviewed reports and articles and are therefore very useful and
mostly very current. The content of the following link explains why it is not acceptable to use non-peer reviewed
websites (Why can’t I just Google?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N39mnu1Pkgw
(thank you to La Trobe University for access to this video).

The post LEMT305 LeadershipforManagers appeared first on My Assignment Online.

WhatsApp
Hello! Need help with your assignments?

For faster services, inquiry about  new assignments submission or  follow ups on your assignments please text us/call us on +1 (251) 265-5102

Submit Your Questions to Writers for FREE!!

X
GET YOUR PAPER DONE