For faster services, inquiry about  new assignments submission or  follow ups on your assignments please text us/call us on +1 (251) 265-5102

WhatsApp Widget

You are a digital forensics investigator hired by XYZ Corporation, a leading tech company specializing in software development and data analytics. XYZ Corp has recently

Assignment Tasks:

  1. Case Introduction:

You are a digital forensics investigator hired by XYZ Corporation, a leading tech company specializing in software development and data analytics. XYZ Corp has recently experienced a significant cybersecurity breach, resulting in the theft of sensitive customer data and intellectual property. The company suspects that an insider may be involved, but external threats cannot be ruled out.

Evidence Collection:

Identify and list the digital devices and storage media that may contain relevant evidence. Develop a plan for collecting and preserving the evidence to maintain its integrity.

Forensic Analysis:

Use appropriate digital forensics tools and techniques to analyse the collected evidence. Identify and document any suspicious files, network activity, or other digital artifacts. Determine the timeline of events and any potential vulnerabilities exploited.

Documentation:

Create a detailed report of your findings, including but not limited to:

  • Chain of custody for evidence
  • Description of the tools and methods used
  • Analysis of digital artifacts
  • Conclusion regarding the incident
  • Recommendations for further actions

Legal Implications:

Discuss the legal and ethical considerations related to digital forensics investigations. Explain how your findings may be used in court and the importance of maintaining the chain of custody.

Presentation:

Prepare a presentation summarizing your investigation and key findings. You may use slides or other visual aids to support your presentation.

Reflection:

Reflect on the challenges and ethical dilemmas you encountered during the investigation.

Discuss what you learned from this assignment and how it relates to real-world digital forensics practices.

General Assessment Requirement

Incomprehensible submissions — Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills to achieve the required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to be both clear and easy to understand. If not, SISTC cannot determine that students have demonstrated their knowledge and skills. Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential for 0 (zero) marks where relevant.

Check with marking rubric: Before submitting your assessment, you should check it against the assessment criteria and the marking rubric included in this specification to ensure that you have satisfactorily addressed all the criteria that will be used to mark your submission.

Feedback

Feedback will be supplied through Moodle. Authoritative results will be published on Moodle.

Academic Misconduct

To submit your assessment task, you must indicate that you have read and understood, and comply with, the Sydney International School of Technology and Commerce Academic Integrity and Student Plagiarism policies and procedures.

You must also agree that your work has not been outsourced and is entirely your own except where work quoted is duly acknowledged. Additionally, you must agree that your work has not been submitted for assessment in any other course or program.

Marking Rubric

CriteriaExcellent (5)Good (3–4)Fair (1–2)Poor (0)Case Introduction

No case

description provided.

Incomplete or unclear case description.Basic case description but lacks depth.

Adequate case

description, provides context.

Evidence Collection

No evidence collection plan or chain of

custody.

Lack of evidence collection plan and poor chain of custody

documentation.

Evidence collection plan is minimal, chain of custody is basic.

Evidence collection plan is present but lacks detail,chain of

custody is acceptable.

Forensic AnalysisNo use of forensic tools or techniques.Minimal use of forensic tools, no documentation of findings.

Limited use of forensictools, findings are poorly

documented.

Moderate use of forensic tools, findings are adequately

documented.

DocumentationNo report provided.Report is missing key sections, and there are no references.Report lacks organization and critical sections, minimal referencing.

Report is structured but missing some sections, references are presentbut not

well-utilized.

Legal ImplicationsNo discussion of legal implications.Minimal discussion, lacks depth or relevance.

Basic discussion of legal considerations, mentions chain of

custody briefly.

Adequate discussion of legal implications, addresses chain of

custody.

PresentationNo presentation provided.Presentation lacks clarity, professionalism, and visual aids (if used).Poor presentation quality, limited use of visual aids.

Presentation is somewhat clear and professional, with minimal use of visual

aids.

ReflectionNo reflection provided.

Superficial reflection with minimal insight into challenges or real-world

applications.

Basic reflection on challenges and real- world relevance.

Thoughtful reflection on challenges and real-world

implications.

Overall Score

Unsatisfactory performance, significant

deficiencies.

Needs improvement in multiple areas.

Satisfactory performance, meets minimum

requirements.

Good performance, meets expectations.

WhatsApp
Hello! Need help with your assignments?

For faster services, inquiry about  new assignments submission or  follow ups on your assignments please text us/call us on +1 (251) 265-5102

We accept Cash App, Zelle, Apple Pay, Google Pay, and Stripe. Contact support for more info!Submit Your Questions to Writers for FREE!!

X
GET YOUR PAPER DONE