Students are required to use the finding sofa needs analysis and usability test conducted on V it Eat mobile app for there port. V it Eat mobile app is a Mobile Food Delivery App. A mobile food delivery app that:

Assessment Details for Assessment Item 2:

Overview

Assessment tasks				LearningOutcome Mapping
Assessment ID	Assessment Item	When due	Weighting	ULO#	CLO #for BITS
2	Needs Analysis and Usability Test Report (Individual)(1500 Words)	Session9	40%	2,3,4	1,2

Introduction

Students are required to use the finding sofa needs analysis and usability test conducted on V it Eat mobile app for there port. V it Eat mobile app is a Mobile Food Delivery App. A mobile food delivery app that:

• Connects customers with local restaurants
  • Offering a platform to browse menus
  • Place orders
  • Track deliveries.

The purpose of this report was to identify user needs, evaluate the product’s usability, and provide recommendations for improvement.

 

Needs Analysis

To understand the needs and expectations of target users in relation to V it Eat mobile app.

• Understanding user preferences for food types, cuisines, and dietary restrictions.
  • Identifying pain points in the current  food ordering process(e.g., long wait times, difficulty finding desired options).
  • Assessing user expectations for delivery speed, accuracy, and customer service.
  • Determining the importance of features like order customization, payment options, and loyalty programs.

 

Usability Testing

To evaluate the usability of V it Eat mobile app and identify areas for improvement.

• Evaluating the ease of navigation within the app (e.g., finding restaurants, browsing menus, placing orders).
  • Assessing the clarity and effectiveness of information displayed (e.g., menu items, pricing, delivery times).

 

• Testing the check out process for efficiency and user-friendliness.
  • Evaluating the order tracking experience and its use fullness to users.
  • Assessing the overall user satisfaction with the app’s design and functionality.

 

Below is the format for the report:

1. Executive Summary
2. Introduction
3. Methodology
   1. Needs Analysis
   2. Usability Testing
4. Findings
   1. Needs Analysis
   2. Usability Testing
5. Analysis and Discussion
6. Recommendations
7. Conclusion
8. Appendices
9. Visuals

 

Students need to use tool the following tools for this assessment:

1. Figma
2. Mock Flow
3. Canva
4. Lucid chart
5. Visual Paradigm

 

Submission Instructions

All submissions are to be submitted through Turnitin. Drop-boxes linked to Turn it in will be setup in Moodle. Assessments not submitted through these drop- boxes will not be considered. Submissions must be made by the end of session 9.

The Turnitin similarity score will be used to determine any plagiarism of your submitted assessment. Turnitin will check conference websites, Journal articles, online resources, and your peer’s submissions for plagiarism. You can see your Turnitin similarity score when you submit your assessments to the appropriate drop-box. If your similarity score is of concern, you can change your assessment and resubmit. However, re-submission is only allowed before.
 

The submission due date and time. You cannot make re-submissions after the due date and time have elapsed.

Note: All work is due by the due date and time. Late submissions will be penalized at 20% of the assessment final grade per day, including weekends.

Marking Criteria/Rubric

You will be assessed on the following marking criteria/Rubric:

Assessment criteria	Exceptional>=80%	Admirable70% –79%	Creditable60%-69%	Acceptable 50%-59%	Unsatisfactory<=49
Methodology   15 marks	Clearly articulated research design, appropriate methodology chosen, detailed explanation of data collection and analysis methods.	Adequate research design, appropriate methodology chosen, explanation of data collection and analysis methods are sufficient.	Adequate research design, appropriate methodology chosen, some explanation of data collection and Analysis methods.	Basic research design, limited explanation of methodology, some gaps in data collection and analysis..	Inadequate research design, inappropriate methodology, insufficient explanation of methods.
	13–15points	9-12points	8-10points	5-7points	0-5points
Finding	Clear and comprehensive	Relevant findings presented,	Relevant findings	Limited findings presented,	Inaccurate or irrelevant findings, lack of data support, no analysis.       0-5points
	Presentation off in dings,	Supported by some data,	presented, supported by	Insufficient data support,
	Supported by data, insightful	analysis  and interpretation.	Some data, basic analysis	Superficial analysis.
	analysis  and interpretation..		And interpretation.
15marks	13-15points	9-12points	8-10 points	5-7points
Report layout & spelling   5 marks	Report layout is consistent and professionally done.     5points	Report layout is consistent and professionally done.     4.5points	Report layout is consistency.     4points	Report layout is consistency. There are some grammatical errors. 3points	The report layout is not consistent and there are many grammatical errors. 2points
Visual       5 marks	Effective use of visuals to enhance understanding, clear and informative, appropriate use of graphics.     5points	Some use of visuals, generally effective, some minor issues with clarity or relevance.     4points	Limited use of visuals, lack of clarity or relevance, inappropriate graphics.     3points	Ineffective use of visuals.     2points	No or in effective use of visuals     0points

 

Assessment Details for Assessment Item 3:

Overview

 

Assessment tasks				LearningOutcome Mapping
Assessment ID	Assessment Item	When due	Weighting	ULO#	CLO #for BITS
3	Part A- Design Report (Group)	Session 13 (Study Week)	30%	1,2,3,4,5	1,2,3,4,5
	Part B- Presentation (Group)	Session 14 (Exam Week)	10%

Introduction

Students will submit work in Design report during the study period and the presentation will happen during the class time. This is a group assessment. The group will be comprised of 4–5 students. The group leader is responsible for submitting the report and the group members are required to submit the group participation form.

This is the continuation of the previous assessment. Students will choose the analysis & usability report from the group members and use it for the design report. Below is the structure for the report:

1. Introduction
2. Design Process
3. Design Rationale
4. User Interface Design
5. Usability Evaluation
6. Conclusion

 

For the presentation, students are expected to pre parea10-minute presentation for part B. The presentation should not exceed 10minutes. Every minute exceeded will occur 5% penalty. All students in the team are required to participate in presentations.

Submission Instructions

All submissions are to be submitted through Turnitin. Drop-boxes linked to Turnitin will be setup in Moodle. Assessments not submitted through these drop- boxes will not be considered. Submissions must be made by the end of session 13.

The Turnitin similarity score will be used to determine any plagiarism of your submitted assessment. Turnitin will check conference websites, Journal articles,

Online resources, and your peer’s submissions for plagiarism. You can see your Turnitin similarity score when you submit your assessments to the                                                                                                                                                                                                              10

 

Appropriate drop-box. If your similarity score is of concern, you can change your assessment and resubmit. However, re-submission is only allowed before the submission due date and time. You cannot make re-submissions after the due date and time have elapsed.

Note: All work is due by the due date and time. Late submissions will be penalized at 20% of the assessment final grade per day, including weekends.

Marking Criteria/Rubric

You will be assessed on the following marking criteria/Rubric:

Assessment criteria	Exceptional>=80%	Admirable70% –79%	Creditable60%-69%	Acceptable 50%-59%	Unsatisfactory<=49
Introduction 5marks	Clear, concise, engaging overview, well-defined target  users and goals.	Adequate project overview, clear target users and goals.	Basic project information, some unclear details about users and goals.	Incomplete or missing information about project, users, or goals.	No project overview or missing essential information.
Design Process   10marks	Comprehensive, detailed, and reflective design process, clear explanation of methodologies and decisions.	Adequate description of design process, some explanation of methodologies and decisions.	Basic overview of design process, limited explanation  of methodologies.	Incomplete or missing information about design process.	No evidence of a design process.
Design Rationale 10 marks	Strong justification for design choices, evidence-based reasoning, innovative solutions.	Adequate justification for design choices, some evidence-based reasoning.	Limited justification for design choices, lack of evidence.	No or weak justification for design choices.	No evidence of design rationale.
User Interface Design 5 marks	Excellent user interface design, effective use of visuals,  strong alignment with user needs.	Good user interface design, adequate use of visuals, alignment with user needs.	Basic user interface design, some usability issues, limited alignment with user needs.	Poor user interface design, significant usability issues, does not meet user needs.	No user interface design presented.
Usability Evaluation 5marks	Rigorous usability testing, comprehensive analysis, actionable recommendations.	Adequate usability testing, some analysis, relevant recommendations.	Limited usability testing, superficial analysis, few recommendations.	No or in adequate usability testing, no analysis or recommendations.	No evidence of usability evaluation.