For faster services, inquiry about  new assignments submission or  follow ups on your assignments please text us/call us on +1 (251) 265-5102

WhatsApp Widget

SPO203: Managing Sports Facilities

SPO203_Assessment Brief 3_Report_Module 4.Docx Page 1 of 5

ASSESSMENT BRIEF 3
Subject Code and Title SPO203: Managing Sports Facilities
Assessment Assessment 3 – Part 2 of 2
Facility Visit, Interview and Analysis Report
Individual/Group Group
Length 1000 words per student – Research Report
Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following learning
outcomes:
a) Identify the functions of sports facilities
b) Evaluate processes required to manage, plan and
operate a sporting facility
c) Recognise risks involved in managing sporting
facilities
Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 4 (Week 7)
Weighting 25%
Total Marks 100 marks

Context:
This assessment is Part 2, following on from Assessment 2 and basing this on the
facility/venue selected in Assessment 2 and working in the same (small) groups. This
assessment asks you to conduct an interview with a facility manager (as outlined in
Assessment 2). It also requires you to analyse the information gained through the interview
and your own desktop research to aid in your development of a report that provides
background and context to the facility and its’ operations, as well as your interpretations,
overall assessment and recommendations.
This assessment provides insight into the business practice of outsourcing an (external)
review of a business and its operations for the purpose of reviewing practices, procedures,
site conditions, requirements and other operational aspects.
Through this assessment, students will gain a direct understanding of their chosen facility
type from a service and operations perspective. The process used in this assessment mimics
real‐life activities such as interviewing, working in teams, using project management, report
development and contributes to knowledge of continuous improvement by using analysis to
determine operational risks, activities or processes requiring improvement.
SPO203_Assessment Brief 3_Report_Module 4.Docx Page 2 of 5
Skills derived and honed in the Assessment process include:
 Interview skills
 Research
 Analytical and Critical Thinking
 Evaluation
 Report writing
Instructions:
1. Conduct an interview with your chosen facility/venue’s Facility Manager or Business
Manager using the interview questions prepared in Assessment 2. Students must
ensure that their group’s interview questions are modified to incorporate changes
per lecturer’s feedback of Assessment 2;
2. Conduct supplementary (extra, additional) desktop research to support information
gained from the interview. This might include research to follow up on key points
arising out of the interview and could include, for example, reviewing the following:
o The facility owner’s Annual Report or other Business Plan;
o Researching further on specific facility/venue infrastructure specifications;
o Consulting OH&S legislation or guidelines, or
o Reviewing Sport (national or state) or sport facility requirements or
specifications.
3. Develop a report that comprises of:
a. Brief background research i.e. select and incorporate, briefly, core facility
information from Assessment 2 such as the facility address and name the uses
onsite;
b. Describe the facilities’ governance model, ownership structure and key
relationships – organisation charts may be utilised. Ensure to clarify whether the
facility is under a lease type of arrangement and if so briefly describe its’
structure and obligations for the facility ;
c. In an ‘informational’ style, incorporate key information gained from the
interview covering the facilities’ :
i. management practices
ii. list and describe (specifications) of key fixed infrastructure and key
equipment
iii. maintenance management
iv. operations management
v. venue design including identifying available spaces and use of
spaces (space management approach]. Use of images, graphics,
plans or other visuals is encouraged;
vi. details of pending improvements/capital works/refurbishments
SPO203_Assessment Brief 3_Report_Module 4.Docx Page 3 of 5
vii. the Facility Manager’s or Business Manager’s role and
responsibilities
viii. Any other relevant information
4. A section must be written in an analysis writing style. This must consider your views
of key points derived from the interview and research. This might include
observations of, for example, challenges in staffing or that the facility has aged
infrastructure and no immediate plans to upgrade. Additionally your observations
might consider any critical issues that might impact the facility financially or legally;
Round this section off by providing a conclusion that outlines your group’s overall
‘findings’ and recommendations (you must develop these yourselves). The
recommendations should include consideration of operational cost savings measures
and may include environmental approaches.
Format of document:
 Provide a professional looking document that includes a Title page, Table of
Contents and use of page numbers. Use of images or other visuals such as Smart Art,
maps or plans are encouraged. Use of tables and Appendices is encouraged, note
that content in these formats are not included in the word count.
 The paper should be in a report style format (with headings) and should have a
structure that includes an introduction, a body and conclusion (comprising of
findings and recommendations).
 You may use footnotes if necessary to include extra information, which may
otherwise disrupt the flow of the paper. Footnotes are not included in the word
count.
 Include a full reference list. The reference list should be in the appropriate College
referencing style (see the Academic Writing guide). Make sure you properly
acknowledge any material from another author/source you use including research
material (such as articles, government reports/websites, and interviews). See the
Academic Writing Guide for assistance.
SPO203_Assessment Brief 3 Page 4 of 5
Learning Rubrics

Assessment Attributes
Marks for each criteria
Fail
(Unacceptable)
0‐49%
Pass
(Functional)
50‐64%
Credit
(Proficient)
65‐74%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75‐84%
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85‐100%
Critical evaluation of
chosen facility and
organisation
(30%)
Poor evaluation. Significant gaps in
knowledge of the facility and lack of
understanding of the facility and
organisation’s operational capabilities.
Simple discussion of areas
of strength and weakness
in the facility and
organisation’s operational
capabilities.
Works reflects limited
engagement with the
facility and organisation’s
context.
Not all aspects of task
completed in sufficient
detail.
Identifies and discusses
areas of strength and
weakness in the facilities’
and organisation’s
operational capabilities.
Discussion of some
relevant observations of
the facility and
organisation’s operations
in evaluation.
Identifies and clearly
explains
areas of strength and
weakness in the
facility’s and
organisation’s
operational
capabilities.
Links to
organisational
context and relevant
observations and
views in evaluation
Identifies and
insightfully discusses
areas of strength and
weakness in the
facilities and
organisation’s
operational capabilities.
Strong links to
organisational context
and relevant
observations and views
in evaluation.
Explain and discuss your
main observations,
findings and/or
conclusions arising from
your research and the
interview
(30%)
Poor explanation, discussion, or
supporting evidence for the main
observations, findings and/or
conclusions.
Answer expressed poorly.
Explains and discusses
main observations,
findings and/or
conclusions, expressed
clearly.
Minimal use of supporting
evidence incorporated
into explanation and
discussion.
Explains and examines
main observations,
findings and/or
conclusions, expressed
clearly.
Moderate use of
supporting evidence
incorporated into
explanation and
discussion.
Explains and analyses
main observations,
findings and/or
conclusions,
expressed succinctly.
Appropriate use of
supporting evidence
incorporated into
explanation and
discussion.
Explains and critically
evaluates main
observations, findings
and/or conclusions,
expressed succinctly and
overall demonstrates
insight.
Extensive use of rational
evidence incorporated
into explanation and
discussion.

SPO203_Assessment Brief 3 Page 5 of 5

Demonstrates practical
ideas or approaches for
real life facility
management
(30%)
Poor understanding and incorrect
application of practical ideas or
approaches for real life facility
management.
Demonstration of some
practical ideas or
approaches for real life
facility management.
Demonstration of
reasonably practical ideas
or approaches for real life
facility management.
Demonstrates
significant practical
ideas or approaches
for real life facility
management, and in
the correct context.
Extensive understanding
and use of practical
ideas or approaches for
real life facility
management, and used
in the correct context.
Use of academic and
discipline conventions
and sources of evidence
(10%)
Poorly written with errors in spelling,
grammar.
Demonstrates inconsistent use of good
quality, credible and relevant research
sources to support student’s views.
There are mistakes in using the APA style.
Is written according to
academic genre (e.g. with
introduction, conclusion
or summary) and has
accurate spelling,
grammar, sentence and
paragraph construction.
Demonstrates consistent
use of credible and
relevant research sources
to support student’s
views, but these are not
always explicit or well
developed.
There are no mistakes in
using the APA style.
Is well written and
adheres to the academic
genre (e.g. with
introduction, conclusion
or summary).
Demonstrates consistent
use of high quality,
credible and relevant
research sources to
support student’s views.
There are no mistakes in
using the APA style.
Is very well written
and adheres to the
academic genre.
Consistently
demonstrates expert
use of good quality,
credible and relevant
research sources to
support and develop
appropriate
arguments and
statements. Shows
evidence of reading
beyond the key
reading
There are no
mistakes in using the
APA style.
Expertly written and
adheres to the academic
genre.
Demonstrates expert
use of high quality,
credible and relevant
research sources to
support and develop
arguments and position
statements. Shows
extensive evidence of
reading beyond the key
reading
There are no mistakes in
using the APA Style.
WhatsApp
Hello! Need help with your assignments?

For faster services, inquiry about  new assignments submission or  follow ups on your assignments please text us/call us on +1 (251) 265-5102

Submit Your Questions to Writers for FREE!!

X
GET YOUR PAPER DONE