For faster services, inquiry about  new assignments submission or  follow ups on your assignments please text us/call us on +1 (251) 265-5102

WhatsApp Widget

BA Business Management

LEVEL/ LEFEL 5
MODULE CODE/ COD Y MODIWL: LCBB5000
DATA HANDLING AND BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE
ASSESSMENT TYPE/ MATH O ASESU: ASSIGNMENT
ASSESSMENT/COMPONENT/ ASESIAD/CYDRAN: 1
COMPONENT WEIGHTING/ PWYSAU’R CYDRAN: 25 %
WORD COUNT/ NIFER Y GEIRIAU: 1250 WORDS/ O EIRIAU
SUBMISSION DETAILS/ MANYLION CYFLWYNO:
Make sure that Your Name , Your Student Number, Your Module Title,
Assignment Title and Your Module Lecturer’s Name are clearly shown on
the front page of your assignment
All assignments must be submitted electronically to Moodle.
DO NOT put this form into Turnitin or it will match many similarities with
other students’ submissions.
Page 1 of 6
BACHELORS DEGREE ASSIGNMENT SPECIFICATION

Programme: BA Business Management
Lecturer: Riaz Bhatti Internal Verifier: Balendran Kandasamy
Assignment Title: Assessment 1
Hand Out Date: Week 2 of Term Submission Please refer to the assessments
deadline: schedule published on Students’ Hall
in Moodle

Referencing: In the main body of your submission you must give credit to authors on whose research your work is based. Append to
your submission a reference list that indicates the books, articles, etc. that you have read or quoted in order to
complete this assignment (e.g. for books: surname of author and initials, year of publication, title of book, edition,
publisher: place of publication).
Late submission will result in a late penalty mark, as follows:
Up to one week late, maximum mark of 40% for first attempts and 0% for resubmissions. No work will be
accepted more than one week after the submission deadline
(Academic Quality Handbook 2016/17 7.5 (5))
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Upon the successful completion of this module, the student should be able to demonstrate the ability to:
1. Identify and critically evaluate the current trends in data warehousing, business intelligence and data
mining.
2. Demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge and systematic understanding of essential concepts and
principles by using predictive analytic software.
TASK DESCRIPTION
Assessment Component 1 – 25%
You will write a journal review on current trend in Business Intelligence that you will have covered over the
course of the semester which you will need to agree with your tutor. Your tutor is not only interested in the
coverage and content of the article being reviewed but also in your critical assessment of the ideas and
argument that are being presented by the author.
Page 2 of 6
Use the following research article, ‘Realizing the strategic impact of business intelligence utilization’ as a
starting point for your research to help with identifying current trends in BI:
As a technology-driven process for analysing data and presenting actionable information to help
managerial decision-making, business intelligence has become an important concept with the availability
of “big data” (Puklavec et al., 2018). Business intelligence is integrated into regular work practices as an
appropriate tool to extract “big data” in a speedy way to make the right decisions. The dimensions of
business intelligence include data integration, analytical capabilities, content quality in business
processes, and decision-making culture (Eidizadeh et al., 2017).
Full report:
Lim, Y. and Teoh, A. 2020. Realizing the strategic impact of business intelligence utilization [Online]
Available at: https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
[Accessed 02 October 2020].
Page 3 of 6
GUIDANCE FOR STUDENTS IN THE COMPLETION OF TASKS
NOTE: The guidance offered below is linked to the five common assessment criteria overleaf.
1. Research-informed Literature
Your work must be informed and supported by scholarly material that is relevant to and focused on the
task(s) set. You should provide evidence that you have accessed a wide range of sources, which may be
academic, governmental and industrial; these sources may include academic journal articles, textbooks,
current news articles, organisational documents, and websites. You should consider the credibility of your
sources; academic journals are normally highly credible sources while websites require careful
consideration/selection and should be used sparingly. Any sources you use should be current and up-todate, typically published within the last five years or so, though seminal works in the field may be older. You
must provide evidence of your research/own reading throughout your work, using in-text citations in the
main body of your work and a reference list that is alphabetical at the end of your work. Please use the
Harvard referencing system.
Specific to Assignment 1: You need to have a minimum of 6 academic sources, correctly referenced in
Harvard style.
2. Knowledge and Understanding of Subject
Your work must demonstrate the growing extent of your knowledge and understanding of concepts and
underlying principles associated with the subject area. Knowledge relates to the facts, information and skills
you have acquired through your learning. You demonstrate your understanding by interpreting the meaning
of the facts and information (knowledge). This means that you need to select and include in your work the
concepts, techniques, models, theories, etc. appropriate to the task(s) set. You should be able to explain
the theories, concepts, etc. meaningfully to show your understanding. Your mark/grade will also depend
upon the extent to which you demonstrate your knowledge and understanding; ideally each should be
complete and detailed, with comprehensive coverage.
3. Analysis
Your work must contain evidence of logical, analytical thinking, evaluation and synthesis. For example, to
examine and break information down into parts, make inferences, compile, compare and contrast
information. This means not just describing What! but also justifying: Why? How? When? Who? Where? At
all times, you must provide justification for your arguments and judgements. Evidence that you have
reflected upon the ideas of others within the subject area is crucial to you providing a reasoned and
informed debate within your work. Furthermore, you should provide evidence that you are able to make
sound judgements and convincing arguments using data and concepts. Sound, valid conclusions are
necessary and must be derived from the content of your work. There should be no new information
presented within your conclusion. Where relevant, alternative solutions and recommendations may be
proposed.
4. Practical Application and Deployment
You should be able to demonstrate how the subject-related concepts and ideas relate to real world
situations or a particular context. How do they work in practice? You will deploy models, methods,
techniques, and/or theories, in that context, to assess current situations, perhaps to formulate plans or
solutions to solve problems, some of which may be innovative and creative. This is likely to involve, for
instance, the use of real world examples and cases, the application of a model within an organisation
and/or benchmarking one organisation against others based on stated criteria. You should show awareness
of the limitations of concepts and theories when applied in particular contexts.
Page 4 of 6
5. Skills for Professional Practice
Your work must provide evidence of the attributes expected in professional practice. This includes
demonstrating your individual initiative and/or collaborative working. You must communicate effectively in a
suitable format, which may be written and/or oral, for example, essay, management report, presentation.
Work should be coherent and well-structured in presentation and organisation.
Essential Resources:
Resources listed on the lecture schedule and on Moodle
The student handbook
Word count guideline & marking criteria:
1. Research-informed Literature (10 mark) 200 – 220 words
2. Knowledge and Understanding of Subject (30 marks) 300 – 330 words
3. Analysis (30 marks) 300 – 330 words
4. Practical Application and Deployment (20 marks) 250 – 275 words
5. Skills for Professional Practice (10 marks) 200 – 220 words
Page 5 of 6
COMMON ASSESSMENT AND MARKING CRITERIA

OUTRIGHT FAIL UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD VERY GOOD EXCELLENT EXCEPTIONAL
Assessment Criteria 0-29% 30-39%* 40-49% 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-100%
1. Research-informed Little or no evidence Poor evidence of References to a Inclusion of a range Inclusion of a wide A comprehensive Outstanding
Literature of reading. reading and/or of limited range of of research- range of research- range of research knowledge of
Views and findings reliance on mostly relevant informed literature, informed literature, informed literature research-informed
Extent of research
unsupported and inappropriate sources. Some including sources including sources embedded in the literature embedded
and/or own reading, non-authoritative. sources, and/or omissions and minor retrieved retrieved work. Excellent in the work.
selection of credible Referencing indiscriminate use of errors. independently. independently. selection of relevant Outstanding
conventions largely sources. Referencing Referencing Selection of relevant and credible selection of relevant
sources, application of
ignored. Referencing conventions evident conventions mostly and credible sources. High-level and credible
appropriate conventions used though not always consistently applied. sources. Very good referencing skills, sources. High-level
referencing inconsistently. applied consistently. use of referencing consistently applied. referencing skills
conventions, consistently and
conventions
consistently applied. professionally
applied.
2. Knowledge and Major gaps in Gaps in knowledge, Evidence of basic Knowledge is Knowledge is Excellent knowledge Highly detailed
Understanding of knowledge and with only superficial knowledge and accurate with a good extensive. Exhibits and understanding knowledge and
understanding of understanding. understanding of understanding of understanding of of the main understanding of
Subject
material at this Some significant the relevant the field of study. the breadth and concepts and key the main
Extent of knowledge level. Substantial inaccuracies. concepts and depth of established theories. Clear theories/concepts,
and understanding of inaccuracies. underlying views. awareness of and a critical
principles. challenges to awareness of the
concepts and
established views ambiguities and
underlying principles and the limitations limitations of
associated with the of the knowledge knowledge.
base.
discipline.
3. Analysis Unsubstantiated Some evidence of Evidence of some Evidence of some Sound, logical, Thoroughly logical Exceptional work;
Analysis, evaluation generalisations, analytical logical, analytical logical, analytical analytical thinking; work, supported by judiciously selected
made without use of intellectual skills, thinking and some thinking and synthesis and evaluated evidence. and evaluated
and synthesis; logic,
any credible but for the most attempts to synthesis. Can evaluation. Ability to High quality analysis, evidence. Very high
argument and evidence. Lack of part descriptive. synthesise, albeit analyse new and/or devise and sustain developed quality analysis,
judgement; analytical logic, leading to Ideas/findings with some abstract data and persuasive independently or developed
unsupportable/ sometimes illogical weaknesses. situations without arguments, and to through effective independently or
reflection;
missing conclusions. and contradictory. Some evidence to guidance. review the collaboration. through effective
organisation of ideas Lack of any attempt Generalised support findings/ An emerging reliability, validity & Ability to investigate collaboration.
and evidence to analyse, statements made views, but evidence awareness of significance of contradictory Ability to investigate
synthesise or with scant evidence. not consistently different stances evidence. Ability to information and contradictory
evaluate. Conclusions lack interpreted. and ability to use communicate ideas identify reasons for information and
relevance. Some relevant evidence to support and evidence contradictions. identify reasons for
conclusions and the argument. accurately and Strong, persuasive, contradictions.
recommendations, Valid conclusions convincingly. conclusions, Highly persuasive
where relevant and Sound, convincing justifiable conclusions
recommendations, conclusions / recommendations.
where relevant recommendations.
4. Practical Limited or no use of Rudimentary An adequate A good and A very good An advanced Outstanding levels
Application and methods, materials, application of awareness and appropriate application of a application of a of application and
tools and/or methods, materials, mostly appropriate application of range of methods, range of methods, deployment skills.
Deployment
techniques. tools and/or application of well standard methods, materials, tools materials, tools Assimilation and
Effective deployment Little or no techniques but established materials, tools and/or techniques. and/or techniques. development of
of appropriate appreciation of the without methods, materials, and/or techniques. Very good The context of the cutting edge
context of the consideration and tools and/or Good appreciation consideration of the application is well processes and
methods, materials,
application. competence. Flawed techniques. of the context of the context of the considered, with techniques.
tools and techniques; appreciation of the Basic appreciation of application, with application, with extensive use of
extent of skill context of the the context of the some use of perceptive use of relevant examples.
application. application. examples, where examples, where Application and
demonstrated in the
relevant. relevant. deployment extend
application of Evidence of some beyond established
concepts to a variety innovation and conventions.
creativity. Innovation and
of processes and/or
creativity evident
contexts; formulation throughout.
of innovative and
creative solutions to
solve problems.
5. Skills for Communication Media is poorly Can communicate in Can communicate Can communicate Can communicate Can communicate
Professional Practice media is designed and/or not a suitable format effectively in a well, confidently and professionally and, with an
inappropriate or suitable for the but with some room suitable format, but consistently in a confidently in a exceptionally high
Demonstrates
misapplied. audience. for improvement. may have minor suitable format. suitable format. level of
attributes expected in Little or no evidence Poor independent or Can work as part of errors. Can work very well Can work professionalism.
professional practice of autonomy in the collaborative a team, but with Can work effectively as part of a team, professionally within Can work
completion of tasks. initiative. limited involvement as part of a team, with very good a team, showing exceptionally well
including: individual
Work is poorly Work lacks in group activities. with clear contribution to leadership skills as and professionally
initiative and structured and/or structure, Work lacks contribution to group activities. appropriate, within a team,
collaborative working; largely incoherent. organisation, and/or coherence in places group activities. Work is coherent managing conflict showing advanced
coherence and could be better Mostly coherent and fluent and is and meeting leadership skills.
deployment of
structured. work and is in a well structured and obligations. Work is
appropriate media to suitable structure. organised. Work is coherent, exceptionally
communicate very fluent and is coherent, very
presented fluent and is
(including written and
professionally. presented
oral); clarity and professionally.
effectiveness in
presentation and
organisation.

Page 6 of 6

WhatsApp
Hello! Need help with your assignments?

For faster services, inquiry about  new assignments submission or  follow ups on your assignments please text us/call us on +1 (251) 265-5102

We accept Cash App, Zelle, Apple Pay, Google Pay, and Stripe. Contact support for more info!Submit Your Questions to Writers for FREE!!

X
GET YOUR PAPER DONE