✍️ Get Writing Help
WhatsApp
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
Agent
👋 How can we help with you?
💬 Hi, how can I help?

BUS3008 Project Execution Planning and Management

/ Uncategorized / By

Page | 8
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version
Unit Code and Title: SBM3302/BUS3008 Project Execution Planning and Management
Assessment Overview

Assessment Task Weighting Due Length ULO CLO GA
Assessment 1: Weekly
Quiz
(Closed book), Individual		 40%
=
(8 x 5%)		 Week 2,
Week3,
Week4,
Week 5,
Week6,
Week7,
Week8,
Week9,		 10 mins
each		 ULO-1 CLO-1
CLO-2
Assessment 2: Case Study
Individual
A case study for students
to practice the contract
management concepts		 30% Week 6 1500 words ULO-1
ULO-2
ULO-3		 CLO1,
CLO2,
CLO5,
CLO7,
CLO9		 GA2,
GA7,
GA11
Assessment 3: Report
and Presentation
Group, Staged
submissions (2parts)
(Part A)
(Part B)
The assignment is
designed for students to
practice the tender
proposal processes and
documentations.		 30%
=
(20%)
(10%)		 Week 10
Week 12		 2000 words
12 slides		 ULO-1
ULO-2
ULO-3
ULO-4		 CLO1,
CLO2,
CLO5,
CLO7
CLO8
CLO9		 GA2,
GA7,
GA8,
GA11

Assessment Details
Page | 8
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version
Assessment 1: Online Quiz

Due date: Week 2, Week3, Week4, Week 5, Week6, Week7, Week8,
Week9,
Group/individual: Individual
Word count / Time provided: 10 minutes
Weighting: (8 x 5%) = 40%
Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1
Course Learning Outcomes: CLO-1, CLO-2
Graduate Attributes:

Assessment Details:
These weekly quizzes will assess your knowledge of key concepts discussed during sessions and
mentioned in pre-recorded weekly lectures. For successful completion of the quiz, you are required to
study the material provided (lecture slides, tutorials, and reading materials), engage in the unit’s
activities, and in the discussion forums. The prescribed textbook is the main reference along with the
recommended reading material. By completing this assessment successfully, you will be able to
identify key aspects of risk management as per best project management practices. This will then help
in achieving ULO1, this in turn will help you in achieving CLO-1 and CLO-2
The quizzes will be completed online weekly during regular class time.
Marking Information: Each quiz will be marked out of 5 and will be weighted 5% of the total unit
mark (40% in total).
Page | 8
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version
Assessment 2: Case Study

Due date: Week 6
Group/individual: Individual
Word count / Time provided: 1500 words
Weighting: 30%
Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3
Course Learning Outcomes: CLO1 CLO2, CLO5, CLO7, CLO9
Graduate Attributes: GA2, GA7, GA11

Assessment Details:
The assignment is designed as an imaginary case study for students to practice procurement and risk
management concepts.
The individual assignment has the following major deliverables:
1. Select a project at your target company
2. Provide background of the case project
3. Recommend the best project delivery method for your project based on the criteria that YOU think
is most crucial to this project. Be mindful that the types of delivery methods that need to be
evaluated are Design-Bid-Build, Design-Build and CM@Risk. You must document all your
assumptions and rationale for the selection of the project delivery system. All yours suggested
grading (the criteria, weights, and scores) should come with justifications and explain why you gave
such grade to each element of the selection matrix.
4. Evaluate and recommend the best financial contract type for your project based on the criteria that
YOU think are crucial to this project. The types of contract that need to be evaluated are Lump sum
contract, Guaranteed Maximum Price Contract and Cost-Plus Fixed Fee Contract. All grading must
be justified and explained.
5. Evaluate and recommend the best procurement method for your project based on the criteria that
are crucial to this project. The types of procurement that need to be evaluated are Competitive,
Negotiated and Best Value. All grading must be justified and explained.
6. Develop Risk Management Plan including Risk Register, Risk Quadrant Analysis, and risk mitigation
plan
Page | 8
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version
Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30%
of the total unit mark

Marking Criteria Not
satisfactory
(0-49%) of the
criterion mark)		 Satisfactory
(50-64%) of
the criterion
mark		 Good
(65-74%) of
the criterion
mark		 Very Good
(75-84%) of
the criterion
mark		 Excellent
(85-100%) of the
criterion mark
Demonstrate a
critical
understanding of
project
management
processes
including
contracting,
tendering, leasing, and
procurement
(45 marks)		 Inadequate
understanding
of project
management
processes
including
contracting,
tendering,
leasing, and
procurement;
cannot discuss
concepts in
own words		 Basic
knowledge
only of project
management
processes
including
contracting
, tendering,
leasing, and
procurement;
limited depth
of basic
concepts		 Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of project
management
processes
including
contracting,
tendering,
leasing, and
procurement		 Exhibits
accurate &
detailed
breadth &
depth of
understanding
of project
management
processes
including
contracting
, tendering,
leasing, and
procurement		 Displays
exceptional
understanding
of concepts & their
practical
application of
project
management
processes including
contracting,
tendering,
leasing, and
procurement
Identify and
critically assess the
risks associated
with projects
(35 marks)		 Inadequate
understanding
of the risks
associated
with projects;
cannot discuss
concepts in
own words		 Basic
knowledge
only of the
risks
associated
with projects;
limited depth
of basic
concepts		 Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of the risks
associated
with projects		 Exhibits
Accurate &
detailed
breadth &
depth of
understanding
of the risks
associated
with projects		 Displays
exceptional
understanding of
concepts & their
practical
application
of the risks
associated
with projects
Writing and
Presentation (15
marks) – Evidence of
good academic writing; –
Free of any grammatical
errors; using correct
sentence structure;
applying an extensive
range of vocabulary; –
Proper introduction and
conclusion. Consistent
formatting with suitable
headings and sub
headings – Consistent
use of labels, highlights,
font weight & underline		 Inadequate
Writing and
Presentation
skills		 Basic
Writing and
Presentation
skills		 Exhibits
breadth and
depth Writing
and
Presentation
skills		 Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of
Writing and
Presentation
skills		 Displays
Exceptional Writing
and Presentation
skills
Referencing (5 marks) –
Comprehensive
Reference list –
Appropriate Referencing
using HARVARD
guidelines		 Inadequate
understanding
of Referencing		 Basic
knowledge
only of
Referencing		 Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of developing
and using
Referencing		 Exhibits
accurate &
detailed
breadth &
depth of
understanding
& using
Referencing		 Displays
Exceptional
understanding
of developing
and using
Referencing

Page | 8
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version
Assessment 3: Report and Presentation (Part A)

Due date: Week 10
Group/individual: Individual
Word count / Time provided: 2000 words
Weighting: 20%
Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3, ULO-4
Course Learning Outcomes: CLO-1, CLO-2, CLO-5, CLO-7, CLO-8, CLO-9
Graduate Attributes: GA2, GA7, GA8, GA11

Assessment Details:
The Project is meant to help you apply what you learn in the course to a project that you will evaluate.
You should identify a case project. You should choose any professional project (not personal, like
planning a wedding) to study. This project may be at your current place of work, but it cannot be one
where the company already has PM documents developed (this relies on your academic integrity).
NOTE: Spelling, grammar, and punctuation ALWAYS count!!
Instructions:
Here are the deliverables that you will need to produce:
1. Select a project at your target company
2. Provide background of the case project
3. Develop Quality Management Plan including at least 5 total metrics (qualitative and/or
quantitative)
4. Develop Stakeholder Management Plan including conflict management plan.
Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 20%
of the total unit mark

Marking Criteria Not
satisfactory
(0-49%) of the
criterion mark)		 Satisfactory
(50-64%) of
the criterion
mark		 Good
(65-74%) of
the criterion
mark		 Very Good
(75-84%) of
the criterion
mark		 Excellent
(85-100%) of
the criterion
mark
Provide background of
the case project
(10 marks)		 Inadequate
Background of
the case project		 Basic
Background of
the case project		 Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
Background of
the case project		 Exhibits
accurate
and
detailed
breadth
and depth of
Background of
the case project		 Displays
exceptional
Background of
the case project

Page | 8
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version

Describe and
discuss relevant
quality standards
and their role in
effective project
management
(20 marks)		 Inadequate
understanding of
relevant
quality
standards
and their
role in
effective
project
management
; cannot
discuss
concepts in
own words		 Basic
knowledge only
of
relevant
quality
standards
and their
role in
effective
project
management;
limited
depth of
basic
concepts		 Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of relevant
quality
standards
and their
role in
effective
project
management		 Exhibits
accurate
and
detailed
breadth
and depth of
understanding
of relevant
quality
standards
and their
role in
effective
project
management		 Displays
exceptional
understanding
of concepts
and their
practical
application of
relevant
quality
standards and
their role in
effective
project
management
Develop Quality
Management Plan
(10 marks)
including at least 5 total
metrics		 Inadequate
Develop Quality
Management
Plan		 Basic
Develop Quality
Management
Plan		 Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
Develop Quality
Management
Plan		 Exhibits
accurate
and
detailed
breadth
and depth of
Develop Quality
Management
Plan		 Displays
exceptional
Develop Quality
Management Plan
Demonstrate
an understanding
of conflict
management
practices and
their role in addressing
project management
challenges (40 marks)		 Inadequate
understanding
of conflict
management
practices and
their role in
addressing
project
management
challenges;
cannot discuss
concepts in
own words		 Basic
knowledge
only of
conflict
management
practices and
their role in
addressing
project
management
challenges;
limited depth
of basic
concepts		 Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of conflict
management
practices and
their role in
addressing
project
management
challenges		 Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth
and depth of
understanding
of conflict
management
practices and
their role in
addressing
project
management
challenges		 Displays
exceptional
understanding
of concepts and
their practical
application of
conflict
management
practices and
their role in
addressing
project
management
challenges
Writing and
Presentation (15
marks) – Evidence of
good academic writing; –
Free of any grammatical
errors; using correct
sentence structure;
applying an extensive
range of vocabulary; –
Proper introduction and
conclusion. Consistent
formatting with suitable
headings and sub
headings – Consistent
use of labels, highlights,
font weight and
underline		 Inadequate
Writing and
Presentation
skills		 Basic
Writing and
Presentation
skills		 Exhibits
breadth and
depth Writing
and
Presentation
skills		 Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of
Writing and
Presentation
skills		 Displays
Exceptional
Writing and
Presentation skills
Referencing (5 marks) –
Comprehensive
Reference list –
Appropriate Referencing		 Inadequate
understanding
of Referencing		 Basic
knowledge
only of
Referencing		 Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of developing		 Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of		 Displays
Exceptional
understanding
of developing

Page | 8
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version

using HARVARD
guidelines		 and using
Referencing		 understanding
of developing
and using
Referencing		 and using
Referencing

Assessment 3: Report and Presentation (Part B)

Due date: Week 12
Group/individual: Individual
Word count / Time provided: 12 Slides
Weighting: 10%
Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3 and ULO-4
Course Learning Outcomes: CLO1, CLO7, CLO8, CLO9
Graduate Attributes: GA2, GA8, GA11

Assessment Details:
In conjunction with the assignment detailed above, there is a second deliverable for the
Project plan exercise. The students are required to present to their client (course lecturer, or a guest
lecturer) their project plan.
Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 10%
of the total unit mark

Marking Criteria Not
satisfactory
(0-49%) of the
criterion mark)		 Satisfactory
(50-64%) of
the criterion
mark		 Good
(65-74%) of
the criterion
mark		 Very Good
(75-84%) of
the criterion
mark		 Excellent
(85-100%) of
the criterion
mark
Presentation topic
knowledge/content
In terms of
relevant
quality standards
and their role in
effective project
management
(25 marks)		 Inadequate
understanding of
relevant
quality
standards
and their
role in
effective
project
management
; cannot
discuss
concepts in
own words		 Basic
knowledge only
of
relevant
quality
standards
and their
role in
effective
project
management;
limited
depth of
basic
concepts		 Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of relevant
quality
standards
and their
role in
effective
project
management		 Exhibits
accurate
and
detailed
breadth
and depth of
understanding
of relevant
quality
standards
and their
role in
effective
project
management		 Displays
exceptional
understanding
of concepts
and their
practical
application of
relevant
quality
standards and
their role in
effective
project
management
Presentation topic
knowledge/content		 Inadequate
understanding		 Basic
knowledge		 Exhibits
breadth and		 Exhibits
accurate and		 Displays
exceptional

Page | 8
Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College
55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111
PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D
Approved: DATE & Version

In terms of conflict
management
practices and
their role in
addressing
project
management
challenges
(25 marks)		 of conflict
management
practices and
their role in
addressing
project
management
challenges;
cannot discuss
concepts in
own words		 only of
conflict
management
practices and
their role in
addressing
project
management
challenges;
limited depth
of basic
concepts		 depth of
understanding
of conflict
management
practices and
their role in
addressing
project
management
challenges		 detailed
breadth
and depth of
understanding
of conflict
management
practices and
their role in
addressing
project
management
challenges		 understanding
of concepts and
their practical
application of
conflict
management
practices and
their role in
addressing
project
management
challenges
Presentation slides
Visual Appeal (25
marks)		 Not Satisfactory
There are too
many errors in
spelling,
grammar and
punctuation. The
slides were
difficult to read,
and slides
contained
information
copied onto
them from
another source.
No visual appeal		 Satisfactory
There are many
errors in
spelling,
grammar and
punctuation.
Too much
information was
contained on
many slides.
Minimal effort
made to make
slides
appealing.		 Good
There are some
errors in
spelling,
grammar and
punctuation.
Too much
information on
more than
three or more
slides.
Presentation
has good visual
appeal.		 Very Good
There are few
errors in
spelling,
grammar and
punctuation.
Too much
information on
two or more
slides.
Presentation
has significant
visual appeal.		 There are no
errors in spelling,
grammar and
punctuation.
Information is
clear and concise
on each slide.
Presentation is
visually
appealing/engagi
ng
Presentation skills and
Preparedness
(25marks)
Recorded audio,
Prepared text in the
notes.		 Evident lack of
Presentation
skills and
preparation/reh
earsal
Dependence on
slides.		 Basic
Presentation
skills and
Preparedness.		 Good
presentation
skills and
Preparedness.		 Very well
prepared and
go beyond what
is presented in
slide.		 Extremely
prepared and
rehearsed.
Excellent
presentation
skills.

For faster services, inquiry about  new assignments submission or  follow ups on your assignments please text us/call us on +1 (251) 265-5102