BUS507 – Assignment 3 Criteria
Due: Week 12
Weighting: 35%
Group Project Presentation and Paper (900-1000 words)
Students will be required to work in teams (3-4 members per group) on an assigned topic for presentation to their peers. Marks for the presentation will be allocated equally to all group members.
All members in the group must present. Every student is expected to present for 4-5 minutes, with 4-5 slides per student, aiding their presentation. It is up to the group to decide the structure and the order of the presentation.
As individuals, students are also required to submit a 900-1,000 word report detailing their role in the group presentation, including their particular contribution to preparation for the presentation.
Students should note the conceptual as well as practical contributions made to the presentation and its preparation.
Criteria for Assessment
Presentation (25%)
- Depth and breadth of issues covered, including explicit reference to relevant literature – 5 marks.
- Demonstrated level of understanding of issues, including specific, theoretically-informed insights acquired into the topic – 10 marks.
- Clarity and coherence of presentation including effective use of media – 10 marks.
- Total: 25 marks
Report (10%)
- Clear specification and discussion of conceptual and practical contributions made to the presentation
- Total: 10 marks
Topics to choose from: the digital divide, data privacy, internet censorship, Green IT and cyberbullying
Marking Rubric
| Presentation | |
| Depth and breadth of issues covered, including explicit reference to relevant literature | |
| Proper depth and breadth of issues covered | /2.5 |
| Explicit reference to relevant literature | /2.5 |
| Total Requirements | /5.00 |
| Demonstrated level of understanding of issues, including specific, theoretically-informed insights acquired into the topic | |
| Clear description of the issues | /2 |
| Demonstrating clear understanding of issues | /3 |
| Demonstrating specific, theoretically-informed-insights | /3 |
| Clear indication of research conducted | /2 |
| Total Requirements | /10 |
| Clarity and coherence of presentation including effective use of media | |
| All members present with clarity and coherence | /5 |
| Use of effective media to enhance presentation | /5 |
| Total Requirements | /10 |
| Report | |
| Clear specification and discussion of conceptual and practical contributions made to the presentation | /7 |
| Proper referencing, organized report and extensive research conducted on the topic | /3 |
| Total Requirements | /10.00 |
| Total | /35.00 |
Assessment 3 Values Audit 2000 Words 40%
| Criteria | HD | D | C | P | F | |
| Depth and breadth of knowledge applied in both organisational analysis and review (10/40) | Exceptional and thorough description/ analysis of context, includes all elements | Very good and thorough description/ analysis of context, includes all elements | Good and thorough description/ analysis of context, includes all elements | Adequate description/ analysis of context, missing a few elements | Limited and incomplete description/ analysis of context, missing many elements | |
| Thorough and insightful identification of material relevant to ascertaining corporate ethical commitments (10/40) | Exceptionally thorough and clearly display outstanding understandin g of the subject matter | Very good display of knowledge and understandin g of the subject matter. | Good display of knowledge and understandin g of the subject matter. | Acceptable display of knowledge and understandin g of the subject matter. | Limited, insufficient display of knowledge and understandin g of the subject matter. | |
| Quality of critical analysis and organisational evaluation, including systematic application of relevant theoretical and practical concepts (15/40) | Exceptional understandin g of the theoretical basis of the varied dimensions with exceptional evidence of recent research related to the issue/s. | Very good understandin g of the theoretical basis of the varied dimensions with good evidence of recent research related to the issue/s. | Good understandin g of the theoretical basis of the varied dimensions with good evidence of recent research related to the issue/s. | Understandin g of the theoretical basis of the varied dimensions with evidence of recent research related to the issue/s. | Limited understanding of theoretical basis of the varied dimensions with little evidence of recent research related to the issue/s. | |
| Quality of written communication , including appropriate identification and citation of relevant theoretical and empirical literature (5/40) | An exceptionally clear, concise and coherent project, critically organised and including all required sections. Academic conventions are rigorously adhered to throughout the essay, with no errors present. | A clear and coherent project, organised an including al required sections. Academic conventions ar rigorously adhered to throughout th essay, with ver few error present. | A somewhat coherent and organized d project and including most required sections. Academic e conventions are adhered to throughout the e essay, with y some errors s present. | A somewhat focused, slightly incoherent project, characterised by some disorganisation and/or missing required sections. Academic conventions are followed inconsistently, a number of errors present. | An unfocussed, incoherent project, characterised by disorganisation and/or missing required sections. Academic conventions are followed inconsistently, a notable number of errors present. |