Assessment Task 2: Heuristic Bias
Details of task:
You are required to produce a written piece, which demonstrates how the material contained in this unit has been or could be, applied to a scenario in your own work practice (or life). Reflect on a recent or past interaction with a customer/client or colleague where a bias affected your behaviour towards that person, provide a brief description of the context and your role then answer the following questions as a series of short-answer responses (approx. 200 words each). Refer to the rubric for more information of what should be included in each question.
What was the nature of the bias?
What led to its activation?
Describe how it affected your behaviour.
Describe how it is likely to have impacted the interaction/work being done with the person.
Outline strategies you could implement to manage such a situation differently in the future.
Confidentiality
ENSURE THAT YOU RIGOROUSLY DE-IDENTIFY ANY CASE-BASED INFORMATION AND ADHERE TO SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY POLICY WITH RESPECT TO CLIENT/PATIENT CONFIDENTIALITY AS OUTLINED IN THE ASSESSMENT COVERSHEET.
Due date: 11.59 pm 09 May 2021
Word limit: 1,000 words (+10% variance allowed)
Value: 30%
Estimated return date: 2 weeks after submission
Criteria for marking: See next page
SectionExcellent HD (>80%)Very Good D (70-79%)Good C (60-69%)Satisfactory P (50-59%)Not Satisfactory N (<49%)Nature of bias ( /10)Provided a clear and concise description of the scenario. The bias is identified and discussed in context demonstrating a nuanced understanding of distortions.Provided a clear description of the scenario. A bias is identified and discussed in context.Provided a description of the scenario. A bias is identified.A scenario is identified, but the bias is not clearly identified.No relevant scenario is provided. 8-107650-4What led to activation ( /20)A consideration and description of the personal, client, discipline, colleagues and/or organisational factors that contributed to the bias are clearly identified and explained. There is evidence of reflective practice and self- critique.A consideration and description of the personal, client, discipline, colleagues and/or organisational factors that contributed to the bias are clearly identified and explained. There is evidence of some reflection.A consideration and description of the personal, client, discipline, colleagues and/or organisational factors that contributed to the bias are clearly identified and explained.A description of personal and client factors that contributed to the bias are clearly identified and explained.No factors are clearly identified, or explanation of link to activation is not made. 16-2014-1512-1310-110-9Affected behaviour ( /20)A description of how the bias changed behaviour is provided, discussed in the context of the factors leading to activation. There is evidence of reflective practice and self-critique.A description of how the bias changed behaviour is provided, discussed in the context of the factors leading to activation. There is evidence of some reflection.A description of how the bias changed behaviour is provided, discussed in the context of the factors leading to activation.A description of how the bias changed behaviour is provided.No description of how the bias changed behaviour is provided. 16-2014-1512-1310-110-9Impact on work ( /20)The response provides a reasoned and well-supported argument as to how the bias activation and behaviour influenced the work with the client and meeting the treatment/rehabilitation goals with the client. There is evidence of reflective practice and self-critique.The response provides a reasoned and well-supported argument as to how the bias activation and behaviour influenced the work with the client and meeting the treatment/rehabilitation goals with the client. There is evidence of some reflection.The response provides a reasoned and well-supported argument as to how the bias activation and behaviour influenced the work with the client and meeting the treatment/rehabilitation goals with the client.The response provides a reasoned argument as to how the bias activation and behaviour influenced the work with the client and meeting the treatment/rehabilitation goals with the client.The response is missing or indicates that the question has been misunderstood, or provides insufficient detail to demonstrate an understanding of the question. 16-2014-1512-1310-110-9Strategies to manage ( /20)Strategies for mitigating bias or averting unhelpful changes in clinician behaviour are clearly identified and explained. There is consideration of practicalities, and there is evidence of reflective practice and self-critique.Strategies for mitigating bias or averting unhelpful changes in clinician behaviour are clearly identified and explained. There is consideration of practicalities, and there is evidence of some reflection.Strategies for mitigating bias or averting unhelpful changes in clinician behaviour are clearly identified and explained. There is consideration of practicalities.Strategies for mitigating bias or averting unhelpful changes in clinician behaviour are clearly identified.The response is missing or indicates that the question has been misunderstood. 16-2014-1512-1310-110-9Written expression and referencing ( /10)The response is communicated with professional language that would be appropriate in a real clinical setting. Concepts are expressed clearly and succinctly, with consideration of nuance. The reference list contains key references clearly linked to the client.The language communicates a professional clinical approach and reflects the nuance of change. The reference list is present and contains a range of references clearly linked to the client.The language used is appropriate for a professional setting and reflects the nuance of change. The reference list is present and contains references relevant to the client.The language used is generally appropriate for a professional setting with some lapses. The reference list is present but may contain references not relevant to the client.The language used is inappropriate for a professional, clinical setting and/or no reference list is provided.
8-107650-4(Worth 30% of total grade for unit) Total /30/100
Get expert help for Core Skills in Forensic Practice and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!
The post Core Skills in Forensic Practice (FBS80001) appeared first on Universal Assignment.