In the scenario assignments, you are asked to reflect on responses to the presented scenario. It should not just be writing down your first reaction or what you already know.
Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowledge and previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic, and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs. Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stance, and discuss the opposing argument. Also, discuss an ethical theory that would apply to defend your view.
To complete each scenario assignment:
1. Complete the entire scenario.
2. Fill out the template attached below, ask your professor for details on submission.
3. Compose the last question on the template reflection in a Word document and be sure to address, at a minimum, the following questions:
Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why?
Which ethical theory would you use to support your stance? Why does this theory work?
4. Support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend your stance.
5. Your reflection must be 1-2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and citation guidelines as appropriate, making sure to cite at least two sources.
6. Review the rubric for specific grading criteria
Points: 50
Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Reflection TemplateDownload Reflection Template
Rubric
PHIL_434_OL – Learning Scenario Reflection (8)
PHIL_434_OL – Learning Scenario Reflection (8)
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues
20 pts
Meets Expectations
Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the main issues in the scenario.
15.8 pts
Approaches Expectations
Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of some of the issues in the scenario.
11.8 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not identify an acceptable understanding of of the issues in the scenario.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLinks to Course Readings and Additional Research
20 pts
Meets Expectations
Makes appropriate and powerful connections between identified issues and the concepts studied in the course readings and presentations; supplements the reflection with relevant and thoughtful research and documents all sources of information, conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend points made.
15.8 pts
Approaches Expectations
Makes somewhat vague connections between identified issues and concepts studied in readings and presentations; supplements the reflection with limited research.
11.8 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Makes inappropriate or little connection between issues identified and the concepts studied in the readings; supplements the reflection, if at all, with incomplete research and documentation.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines
10 pts
Meets Expectations
The assignment follows current APA style format consistently and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.
7.9 pts
Approaches Expectations
The assignment follows current APA style format consistently with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.
5.9 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The assignment does not follow current APA style format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly or citations and references are missing.
10 pts
Total Points: 50
