Academic Year 2022/23
M22004-Supply Chain Management
Coursework2:Poster
DeadlineForSubmission: 13/01/2023 at noon (12:00)
Submission Instructions Upload a poster and its accompanying Excel file on Moodle. As this a 2-part submission, name each file with your student ID.
Instructions for completing the assessment:
See overleaf.
Examiners: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Supply Chain Management Coursework Brief for Poster (Coursework 2)
Specifications:
The poster is individual work and is worth 70% of your mark for the supply chain module. You should prepare a poster addressing the brief shown below.
This is not an essay assignment, and posters that contains too much text will be marked down. You should concentrate on producing high quality analysis supported by a spreadsheet. This should be presented as technical tables and illustrations.
The deadline is 13/01/2023 and your poster should be submitted on Moodle, using any electronic format accepted by Moodle. Typically, this will be a poster in a pdf, Word, Powerpoint, or Publisher format. Your poster should be designed as an A3 landscape format, or larger. You can include as much additional information in the Excel file as you want.
Background
In this coursework, you should expand on the idea that you have proposed in coursework 1 in terms of improving a supply chain. You have to follow a set process (described below), so make sure that you address all aspects of the brief to earn a maximum amount of marks. Do not skip a requirement altogether!
Brief
Your task is to show on a poster a detailed business case for your proposed improvement, which should include the economic feasibility of that improvement. All concepts covered in the lectures and tutorials in the first 7 weeks of the module should be applied. The structure of your poster is free but it is recommended that you make sure that you cover the following points:
Provide a general introduction to your supply chain and the industry that it operates in.
This should include an original supply chain map. The supply chain map should clearly show the end user and all the supply nodes, stock points, and transportation modes.
Scoping of your poster. Improving a supply chain can be a broad task, so you need to scope down your poster to focus on a specific improvement initiative that can be researched and assessed for this coursework. If your scope is too wide, your poster’s content could be too generic, and the analysis too complex, which could lead to a fail mark. Make sure your scope is explicit in your poster and in your Excel file.
Develop a cost framework. For your proposed improvement, devise a cost framework to be used to assess economic feasibility. This will be typically be a cost benefit analysis, but you will first have to define variables such a capacity, utilisation, and demand. If your proposed improvement is not about cost, propose an alternative framework (e.g. environmental impact reduction). If you use an alternative framework, use that framework for this and the following questions.
Populate your cost framework in Excel by using available data from sources that you will have to research. Make assumptions when needed. Show detailed computations in Excel. Show the results in the poster and draw a conclusion about the viability of your initiative.
Perform a risk analysis for your proposed improvement. This can be done by showing a risk register/log/assessment on the poster. Comment on the impact of this step, qualitatively speaking, on your conclusion of part 4.
Select at least one risk factor or an assumption that you think is critical. Select several if relevant. For these selected variables, using Excel, perform a sensitivity analysis of the cost of your supply chain(s). Show the results on the poster and comment on the impact of this step, quantitatively speaking, on your conclusion of part 4.
Marking
The poster will be marked as shown in the table overleaf.
Marking Scheme
MarkIntroduction (10 points)Scoping (20 points)Cost Framework (20 points)Cost Analysis (10 points)Risk Analysis (10 Points)Sensitivity Analysis (10 points)Poster design (10 points)Excel file (10 points)80+Excellent, well researched,Excellent scoping of theA professional- strength costHigh quality secondary dataVery well researched riskAnalytically advancedDesigned with professionalProfessionally presented and
thoroughtask, which isframework hashas been usedanalysis basedsensitivityflair andclear to read
presentation offeasible in thebeen designed.to populate theon theanalysis,making a fullExcel file,
the context oftimescale ofOutstandingframework andcompetentadding ause of thecontaining
the supplyCW1. Focusesresearch.to provide veryapplication ofgenuine depthmultimedia,advanced use
chain. Ability toon a topical
convincing andan establishedto the analysis.rich nature of aof Excel
conciselyissue. Different
interesting costrisk framework.
poster.functions.
present lots ofpossible
estimates.
information.configurations
are designed
with
engineering
flair.
70-79Very good, well researched,Very good scoping of theA very good cost frameworkGood quality secondary dataVery well researched riskVery good and insightfulVery well- designedVery well presented and
thoroughtask, which ishas beenhas been usedanalysis basedsensitivityposter, makingclear to read
presentation offeasible in thedesigned andto populate theon theanalysis.a full use of theExcel file,
the supplytimescale ofis supported byframework.competent
multimedia,containing
chain context.CW1. Focusesvery goodConvincingapplication of
rich nature of aadvanced use
on a topicalresearch.cost estimates.an established
poster.of Excel
issue. Different
risk framework.
functions.
possible
configurations
are considered.
MarkIntroduction (10 points)Scoping (10 points)Cost Framework (20 points)Cost Analysis (10 points)Risk Analysis (10 Points)Sensitivity Analysis (20 points)Poster design (10 points)Excel file (10 points)60-69Good understandingGood scoping of the task,The cost frameworkSome secondary dataWell researched riskThere is a sensitivityWell-designed poster, usingWell-presented and clear to
of the supplywhich isprovides ahas been usedanalysis basedanalysis, but itthe rich natureread Excel file,
chain context;feasible in therobustto populate theon the soundis ratherof a poster.containing
could be moretimescale ofassessment offramework andapplication ofstandard.
some use of
researched.CW1. Focusessupply chain(s)to providean established
Excel
on a topicalbut is missingreasonablyrisk framework.
functions.
issue. Asome key costconvincing cost
handful ofcomponents.estimates.
possible
configurations
are considered.
50-59Basic and genericAverage scoping of theThe cost framework isVery limited data has beenPartially researched riskBasic attempt at a sensitivityVery basic poster designBasic presentation,
presentation oftask, which isincomplete.used. A roughanalysis basedanalysis.not necessarilysomewhat
the supplyfeasible in theThe costs thatidea of costs ison an
takingmessy. Some
chain contexttimescale ofare consideredprovided.acceptable
advantage ofanalysis has
CW1. Notare relevant.
application of
the posterbeen done.
necessarily a
an established
format.
topical issue.
risk framework.
Only one
possible
configuration is
considered (or
poor alternative
configurations).
Get expert help for M22004-Supply Chain Management and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!
The post M22004-Supply Chain Management Best Assignment Help online appeared first on Universal Assignment.