MGNT910 Strategic Management
Assessment 1 (Group Assignment)
Case Presentation Team
| Team number: | ||
| Students: |
Total Mark: presentation: report:
The executive summaries are assessed according to the following criteria:
Marking Criteria for CaseExecutive Summary (Total 100% – weighting 10%)
| Criteria | Excellent | Adequate | Weak |
| Company + Case overview (15%) | Relevant information presented based on textbook and external research | Some relevant and some irrelevant information, mostly based on textbook | Most information irrelevant to the strategic issues of the case, based on textbook only |
| 15-11 | 6-10 | 0-5 | |
| Major issues identified (15%) | Four or more issues identified and explained clearly | Less than four issues identified; Issues explanation incomplete | Two issues or less identified; Explanation of issues incomplete or unclear |
| 15-11 | 6-10 | 0-5 | |
| Relevant theories explained (30%) | Relevant theories identified and clearly explained | Not all relevant theories identified; Clarity of explanation is not optimal | Very few relevant theories identified; Theories explained not relevant; Explanation unclear; Prominent theories not mentioned |
| 30-21 | 11-20 | 0-10 | |
| Recommendations based on theory & analysis (30%) | Recommendations clearly related to theory and case facts | Recommendations partially related to theories and case facts | Recommendations are not clearly related to theory and case facts |
| 30-21 | 11-20 | 0-10 | |
| Questions and Summary (5%) | Questions seek relevant understanding; Summary concisely captures the issues of the case, the relevant theory, and the recommendations | Questions seek some relevant understanding; Summary lacks one or two areas: case issues, relevant theories, and recommendations | Questions seek trivial / non-central aspects; Summary poorly captures all areas: case issues, relevant theories, and recommendations |
| 5-4 | 3-2 | 0-1 | |
| Report presentation (5%) | Professional presentation; Correct spelling; Correct grammar; Adhering to word limit | Proficient presentation; some spelling and grammatical errors; Deviates from word limit by less than 30% | Poor presentation; many spelling and grammatical errors; deviates from word limit by over 30% |
| 5-4 | 3-2 | 0-1 |
Marking Criteria for Case Presentation (Total 100% – weighting 20%)
| Criteria | Excellent | Adequate | Weak |
| Delivery | |||
| Timely delivery of executive summary to presentation team (10) | Delivered executive summary to the peer-review team 3 days before presentation or earlier | Delivered executive summary to the peer-review team 1-2 days before presentation or earlier | Delivered executive summary to the peer-review team less than one day before presentation or earlier |
| 10 | 5 | 0 | |
| Presentation structure (5) | Presentation structure is logical, flows, and understandable | Presentation structure is unclear / disconnected at times | Presentation structure and logic are often hard to follow |
| 5-4 | 3-2 | 0-1 | |
| Presentation skills(5) | Engaging delivery; Stimulating class discussion; Ability to answer questions | Delivery engaging at times; Stimulating some discussion; Ability to address several questions | Non-engaging delivery; Class discussion limited; Struggling to address questions |
| 5-4 | 3-2 | 0-1 | |
| Visual presentation quality (5) | Professional presentation; Correct spelling; Correct grammar; Visually pleasant | Proficient presentation; some spelling and grammatical errors; Visually appropriate | Poor presentation; many spelling and grammatical errors; Visually unpleasant / inconsistent |
| 5-4 | 3-2 | 0-1 | |
| Content + analysis | |||
| Company + Case overview (10) | Relevant information presented based on textbook and external research | Some relevant and some irrelevant information, mostly based on textbook | Most information irrelevant to the strategic issues of the case, based on textbook only |
| 10-8 | 7-4 | 0-3 | |
| Major issues identified (10) | Four or more issues identified and explained clearly | Less than four issues identified; Issues explanation incomplete | Two issues or less identified; Explanation of issues incomplete or unclear |
| 10-8 | 7-4 | 0-3 | |
| Relevant theories explained (25) | Relevant theories identified and clearly explained | Not all relevant theories identified; Clarity of explanation is not optimal | Few relevant theories; Theories explained not relevant; Explanation unclear;Prominent theories not mentioned |
| 25-18 | 17-8 | 0-7 | |
| Class questions (5) | Questions seek relevant understanding | Questions seek some relevant understanding | Questions seek trivial / non-central aspects |
| 5-4 | 3-2 | 0-1 | |
| Recommendations based on theory & analysis (25) | Recommendations clearly related to theory and case facts | Recommendations partially related to theories and case facts | Recommendations are not clearly related to theory and case facts |
| 25-18 | 17-8 | 0-7 |