For faster services, inquiry about  new assignments submission or  follow ups on your assignments please text us/call us on +1 (251) 265-5102

WhatsApp Widget

Project Management in Health Care HQS620

Project Management in Health Care HQS620

Project Management in Health Care HQS620

Course Description

This course examines the models and approaches of project management in health care settings. Learners demonstrate understanding of the project management process and its application to health care quality and safety initiatives. Learners gain skills to identify various stakeholders and roles, set goals and expectations, plan stakeholder engagement, and identify ways to mitigate obstacles in health care project management. Prerequisite: HQS-610 Foundations of Quality Improvement and Patient Safety.

Project Management in Health Care HQS620 Topic 1: Project Management Methodologies

Objectives:

Discuss why project management is needed.
Discuss the value of establishing a framework for a project.
Contrast project management methodologies.

Summary of Current Course Content Knowledge

Assessment Description

Academic engagement through active participation in instructional activities related to the course objectives is paramount to your success in this course and future courses.  Through interaction with your instructor and classmates, you will explore the course material and be provided with the best opportunity for objective and competency mastery.  To begin this class, review the course objectives for each Topic, and then answer the following questions as this will help guide your instructor for course instruction.

Which weekly objectives do you have prior knowledge of and to what extent?
Which weekly objectives do you have no prior knowledge of?
What course-related topics would you like to discuss with your instructor and classmates?  What questions or concerns do you have about this course?

Topic 1 DQ 1

Describe why project management is needed and explain the correlation between the nursing process and project management. Explain the value of establishing a framework for a project and provide an example in which a project management framework aided in the implementation of a new process.

Topic 1 DQ 2

Review Figure 2.1 “The Five Steps of the Nursing Process” and Figure 2.2 “The Five Phases of Project Management” in Chapter 2 of the textbook. As you reflect on the five steps of the nursing process, describe how that process aligns with the concept of project management. Provide specific examples of the similarities between elements of Figure 2.1 and 2.2.

Project Management in Health Care HQS620 Resources

Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse

Read Chapters 1 and 2 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.

View Resource

Hybrid Project Management Has Role in Health Care Today

Read “Hybrid Project Management Has Role in Health Care Today,” by Hakim, from Physician Leadership Journal (2019).

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgao&AN=edsgcl.579714743&site=eds-live&scope=site

Project Management for Healthcare

Read the “Safety” and “Regulatory” sections of Chapter 2 in “Project Management for Healthcare,” by Shirley (2011

… Read More

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://library.books24x7.com/library.asp?%5eB&bookid=46716

9 of the Most Popular Project Management Methodologies Made Simple

Read “9 of the Most Popular Project Management Methodologies Made Simple,” by Aston, located on the Digital Project Manager websi

… Read More

https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/project-management-methodologies-made-simple/

How to Begin a Quality Improvement Project

Read “How to Begin a Quality Improvement Project,” by Silver et al., from American Society of Nephrology (2016).

https://cjasn.asnjournals.org/content/clinjasn/11/5/893.full.pdf

Project Management: Case Studies

Read “Project Management Methodologies” in Project Management: Case Studies.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat01182a&AN=gcu.317842&site=eds-live&scope=site

Top Project Management Methodologies 2019

View “Top Project Management Methodologies 2019,” from KnowledgeHut, located on YouTube.

A Health Care Project Management Office’s Strategies for Continual Change and Continuous Improvement

Read “A Health Care Project Management Office’s Strategies for Continual Change and Continuous Improvement,” by Tremblay Aubry, R

… Read More

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/lo

Topic 1 Assignment: Project Management Methodologies

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to contrast common project management methodologies that can be utilized in health care project management. Conduct your own research so you are able to contrast Lean/Six Sigma, Waterfall, PSDA, and Agile methodologies. In addition, select another project management methodology of your choice.

Use the Project Management Methodologies template to complete the assignment.

This assignment requires two to three scholarly resources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments

HQS-620-RS-ProjectManagementMethodologiesTemplat

Project Management in Health Care HQS620 Topic 1 Assignment Rubric Criteria

Collapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All

Lean/Six Sigma

14.4 points

Criteria Description

Lean/Six Sigma

5: Excellent

14.4 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present and thorough.

4: Good

13.25 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present and detailed.

3: Satisfactory

12.67 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present.

2: Less Than Satisfactory

11.52 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present but lack details or are incomplete.

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are not present.

Waterfall

14.4 points

Criteria Description

Waterfall

5: Excellent

14.4 points

The required elements for Waterfall are present and thorough.

4: Good

13.25 points

The required elements for Waterfall are present and detailed.

3: Satisfactory

12.67 points

The required elements for Waterfall are present.

2: Less Than Satisfactory

11.52 points

The required elements for Waterfall are present but lack details or are incomplete.

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The required elements for Waterfall are not present.

PDSA

14.4 points

Criteria Description

PDSA

5: Excellent

14.4 points

The required elements for PDSA are present and thorough.

4: Good

13.25 points

The required elements for PDSA are present and detailed.

3: Satisfactory

12.67 points

The required elements for PDSA are present.

2: Less Than Satisfactory

11.52 points

The required elements for PDSA are present but lack details or are incomplete.

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The required elements for PDSA are not present.

Agile

14.4 points

Criteria Description

Agile

5: Excellent

14.4 points

The required elements for Agile are present and thorough.

4: Good

13.25 points

The required elements for Agile are present and detailed.

3: Satisfactory

12.67 points

The required elements for Agile are present.

2: Less Than Satisfactory

11.52 points

The required elements for Agile are present but lack details or are incomplete.

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The required elements for Agile are not present.

Additional Project Management Methodology

14.4 points

Criteria Description

Additional Project Management Methodology

5: Excellent

14.4 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are present and thorough.

4: Good

13.25 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are present and detailed.

3: Satisfactory

12.67 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are present.

2: Less Than Satisfactory

11.52 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are present but lack details or are incomplete.

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The required elements for the selected methodology are not present.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

4 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

5: Excellent

4 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4: Good

3.68 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3: Satisfactory

3.52 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2: Less Than Satisfactory

3.2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.

Documentation of Sources

4 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5: Excellent

4 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4: Good

3.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3: Satisfactory

3.52 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2: Less Than Satisfactory

3.2 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Topic 2: Project Manager Role

Objectives:

Describe the role and functions of a project manager.

Topic 2 DQ 1

Describe three significant skills that are essential to have in the role as project manager. How do those skills align with the skills needed in the nursing profession? Provide a specific example to support your answer. Discuss one to two effective strategies to promote a high reliability organization.

Topic 2 DQ 2

As the project manager it is important to understand team dynamics. Describe how you would apply your leadership skills to move team members from the “storming” to “norming” stage of team development.

Topic 2 Resources

Collapse All ResourcesCollapse All

Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse

Read the “PM Roles and Responsibilities” section of Chapter 3 and Chapter 8 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice N

… Read More

View Resource

AHRQ Case Studies – Case Studies of Quality Improvement Initiatives

Explore the case studies on the AHRQ website in preparation for the Topic 2 assignment.

https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/quality-improvement/reports-and-case-studies/Case-Study_QI-Initiatives.html

What Is a Project Manager? The Lead Role for Project Success

Read “What Is a Project Manager? The Lead Role for Project Success,” by Alexander (2019), located on the CIO website.

https://www.cio.com/article/3224865/what-is-a-project-manager-the-lead-role-for-project-success.html#tk.cio_rs

Understanding the Complexity of Project Team Member Selection Through Agent-Based Modeling

Read “Understanding the Complexity of Project Team Member Selection Through Agent-Based Modeling,” by Hsu, Weng, Cui, and Rand, f

… Read More

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/lo

Topic 2 Case Study – Role of a Project Manager

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to determine the role of a project manager for a given case study. Use the “AHRQ Case Studies – Case Studies of Quality Improvement Initiatives” from the AHRQ website located in the Topic 2 topic Resources to complete this assignment. The case studies located in Chapter 8 of the textbook provide additional support for this assignment.

Select and read a case study from “AHRQ Case Studies – Case Studies of Quality Improvement Initiatives”. Once you have read the case study, in a 500-700-word paper, address the following:

Describe the problem outlined in the case study.
Discuss the project goals.
Describe the role of the project manager addressing the following:
Planning
Organizing
Budgeting
Monitoring progress
Managing reports and documentation
Health care quality and safety initiatives.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Topic 2 Case Study Rubric Criteria

Problem Outlined in Case Study

Criteria Description

Problem Outlined in Case Study

5. 5: Excellent

5.6 points

A description of the problem outlined in the case study is present and thorough.

4. 4: Good

5.15 points

A description of the problem outlined in the case study is present and detailed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

4.93 points

A description of the problem outlined in the case study is present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.48 points

A description of the problem outlined in the case study is present but lacks details or is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the problem outlined in the case study is not present or is inaccurate.

Discussion of Project Goals

Criteria Description

Discussion of Project Goals

5. 5: Excellent

7.2 points

A discussion of the project goals is present and thorough.

4. 4: Good

6.62 points

A discussion of the project goals is present and detailed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

6.34 points

A discussion of the project goals is present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5.76 points

A discussion of the project goals is present but lacks details or is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A discussion of the project goals is not present or is inaccurate.

Role of Project Manager in Planning

Criteria Description

Role of Project Manager in Planning

5. 5: Excellent

7.2 points

A description of the project managers role in planning is present and thorough.

4. 4: Good

6.62 points

A description of the project managers role in planning is present and detailed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

6.34 points

A description of the project managers role in planning is present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5.76 points

A description of the project managers role in planning is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the project managers role in planning is not present or is inappropriate.

Role of Project Manager in Organizing

Criteria Description

Role of Project Manager in Organizing

5. 5: Excellent

7.2 points

A description of the project managers role in organizing is present and thorough.

4. 4: Good

6.62 points

A description of the project managers role in organizing is present and detailed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

6.34 points

A description of the project managers role in organizing is present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5.76 points

A description of the project managers role in organizing is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the project managers role in organizing is not present or is inappropriate.

Role of Project Manager in Budgeting

Criteria Description

Role of Project Manager in Budgeting

5. 5: Excellent

7.2 points

A description of the project managers role in budgeting is present and thorough.

4. 4: Good

6.62 points

A description of the project managers role in budgeting is present and detailed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

6.34 points

A description of the project managers role in budgeting is present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5.76 points

A description of the project managers role in budgeting is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the project managers role in budgeting is not present or is inappropriate.

Role of Project Manager in Monitoring Progress

Criteria Description

Role of Project Manager in Monitoring Progress

5. 5: Excellent

7.2 points

A description of the project managers role in monitoring progress is present and thorough.

4. 4: Good

6.62 points

A description of the project managers role in monitoring progress is present and detailed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

6.34 points

A description of the project managers role in monitoring progress is present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5.76 points

A description of the project managers role in monitoring progress is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the project managers role in monitoring progress is not present or is inappropriate.

Role of Project Manager in Managing Reports and Documentation

Criteria Description

Role of Project Manager in Managing Reports and Documentation

5. 5: Excellent

7.2 points

A description of the project managers role in managing reports and documentation is present and thorough.

4. 4: Good

6.62 points

A description of the project managers role in managing reports and documentation is present and detailed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

6.34 points

A description of the project managers role in managing reports and documentation is present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5.76 points

A description of the project managers role in managing reports and documentation is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the project managers role in managing reports and documentation is not present or is inappropriate.

Role of Project Manager in Health Care Quality and Safety Intiatives

Criteria Description

Role of Project Manager in Health Care Quality and Safety Intiatives

5. 5: Excellent

7.2 points

A description of the project managers role in health care quality and safety initiatives present and thorough.

4. 4: Good

6.62 points

A description of the project managers role in health care quality and safety initiatives is present and detailed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

6.34 points

A description of the project managers role in health care quality and safety initiatives is present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5.76 points

A description of the project managers role in health care quality and safety initiatives is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the project managers role in health care quality and safety initiatives is not present or is inappropriate.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. 5: Excellent

5.6 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. 4: Good

5.15 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. 3: Satisfactory

4.93 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4.48 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. 5: Excellent

6.4 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. 4: Good

5.89 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. 3: Satisfactory

5.63 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5.12 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. 5: Excellent

4 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. 4: Good

3.68 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. 3: Satisfactory

3.52 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3.2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Criteria Description

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. 5: Excellent

4 points

All format elements are correct.

4. 4: Good

3.68 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. 3: Satisfactory

3.52 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3.2 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. 5: Excellent

4 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. 4: Good

3.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. 3: Satisfactory

3.52 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3.2 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total80 points
WhatsApp
Hello! Need help with your assignments?

For faster services, inquiry about  new assignments submission or  follow ups on your assignments please text us/call us on +1 (251) 265-5102

We accept Cash App, Zelle, Apple Pay, Google Pay, and Stripe. Contact support for more info!Submit Your Questions to Writers for FREE!!

X
GET YOUR PAPER DONE