RSM5014 Research Methods Assignment: Sunway MHRM Proposal & Presentation 2025

RSM5014 SUBJECT DESCRIPTION

This module provides students with (1) a conceptual understanding which enables them to analyse and evaluate published research; (2) a conceptual understanding of appropriate research designs, and (3) a systematic understanding of data collection and analysis methods and enables students to begin to apply research methods concepts and skills to their own research projects.

SUBJECT OBJECTIVES

The objective of this subject is to provide students with:

the knowledge and skills needed to conduct research in HRM.
the practical information needed to conduct the project that constitutes the assessment for this module.
Sunway Business School RSM 5014 Subject Overview 3

SUBJECT LEARNING OUTCOMES (SLO)

On completion of this subject, students should be able to:

SLO1: Evaluate the relevant literature in human resource management.
SLO2: Manage the relevant tools and techniques in discipline specific research.
SLO3: Conceptualise entrepreneurial qualities in discipline-specific research.
SLO4: Present a discipline-specific research proposal professionally.

DELIVERY METHODS

The course will consist of in-person lectures, discussions, and student presentations on journal articles or book chapters. To facilitate quality classroom discussion and foster a positive learning environment, students are encouraged to complete each assigned reading prior to each session.

ASSESSMENT

Students are assessed based on:

Individual assignment (100%): Full Proposal 60% and Presentation 40%

FULL PROPOSAL (60%)

Through this assignment students will propose a research proposal to address a specific area in human resource management. It is primarily concerned with designing a research proposal and an accompanying literature review and proposed methodology. In it, the research problem is clearly explained, existing literature on related problem is reviewed to suggest hypotheses where relevant and propose a theoretical framework to understand the research problem. Finally, it includes a proposal to gather relevant primary and/or secondary data, as well as the tools to process and analyse data using relevant quantitative and/or qualitative techniques. The proposal will be the basis to conduct independent research for their final module, the Research Dissertation.

Students will submit 4500 words written research proposal. The Assignment will be assessed in accordance with the marking guide provided in the coursework guideline.

An academic supervisor will be assigned to each student by the end of this course. Each student will have to propose a general research topic and/or a research title (if possible) in the week of 3rd meeting. The lecturer and the MHRM program management team will assist students with matters related to academic supervision.

The proposal is due on the 11th of October 2025. You are to submit the full proposal to your supervisor as discussed and agreed by both of you and e-mail a copy to the lecturer.

RESEARCH PROPOSAL PRESENTATION (40%)

The purpose of this presentation is to ensure that the major areas of a proposal has been addressed. Students are expected to present their proposal on 23rd of August 2025. The presentation will be assessed in accordance with the marking guide provided in the coursework guideline.

Do You Need RSM5014 Assignment of Research Proposal

Order Non Plagiarized Assignment

REMINDER ABOUT ACADEMIC MALPRACTICE

Plagiarism consists of unacknowledged use of someone else’s work and attempting to pass it off as one’s own. It includes the representation of work: written, visual, practical or otherwise, of any other person, including another student or anonymous web-based material, or any institution, as the candidate’s own. It may take the form of:

the verbatim copying or insertion of another’s work without clear identification and acknowledgement – including the downloading of materials from the internet without proper referencing, published or unpublished and including work of another student;
paraphrasing by, for instance, substituting a few words or phrases or altering the order of presentation of another person’s work, or
linking unacknowledged sentences or phrases with words of one’s own;
unacknowledged quotation of phrases from another person’s work;
the deliberate and detailed presentation of another’s concept as one’s own;
work that has been completed, altered, translated or corrected by another person, and is submitted as if it was the student’s own work;
work that has already been published in another language, and have been translated into English by the student themselves or by another person;
direct facsimile of an image, a sound or performance without due acknowledgement of its source;
copying work that was originally completed and submitted by the student and resubmitted for another purpose, without acknowledgement of this, unless resubmission is allowed;
Collusion occurs when there is conscious collaboration, without official approval, between two or more students in the preparation and production of work which is ultimately submitted by each in an identical or substantially similar form and/or is represented by each to be the product of his or her individual efforts. Collusion includes:
unauthorised collaboration with another student in completion of work;
submission as entirely his/her own work, work done in collaboration with another person, with the intention to gain an unfair advantage;
knowingly permitting another student to copy all or part of one’s work which that student then submits as their own unaided work;
falsely claims involvement in approved and assessed group work and colludes with that group in order to deceive the lecturer or tutor.
Kindly refer to the Student Handbook for the full guidelines on academic malpractice. The “Turnitin” software is used to detect plagiarism and the University reserves the right to use this software on all submitted assignments.

DISCLOSURE OF PROVISIONAL AND FINAL MARKS

Students must take note that provisional marks are not final marks and subject to change. Final marks are released after confirmation by the Faculty Assessment Board.

SUBJECT OUTLINE

The areas that will be covered in this course are:

Area:

The need for HR projects in organisations
Conduct of systematic research – choosing the paradigm
HR Information – Choosing and managing the data for the project
Designing a practical HR project
Collecting information – Lit review, secondary data and research review
Collecting information – Surveys and questionnaires
Information processing – Statistical or quantitative analysis
Collecting information – Qualitative data and interviews
Information processing – Qualitative or content analysis
The Master’s Research Project

MAIN REFERENCES

Anderson, V., Fontinha, R. & Robson, F. (2019). Research Methods in Human Resource Management (4th Edition). Kogan Page.

Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2022). Business Research Methods (6th Edition). Oxford.

Christensen, L. B., Johnson, B., Turner, L. A., & Christensen, L. B. (2024). Research Methods, Design, and Analysis (13th Edition, Global Edition). Pearson Education Limited.

Schwab, D. P. (2013). Research Methods for Organizational Studies. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611284

ADDITIONAL REFERENCES
Bougie, R., & Sekaran, U. (2019). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative, & Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th edition, SAGE.

Aguinis, H., Bergh, D., & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2023). Methodological challenges and insights for future international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 54(2), 219-232.

Lim, W. M. & Koay, K. Y. (2024). So you want to publish in a premier journal? An illustrative guide on how to develop and write a quantitative research paper for premier journals. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43(3), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22252

Lim, W. M. (2024). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619

Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. 1995. What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371-384.

Take note that the references above are in accordance of the 7th edition of the APA guideline. Please apply this guide. Visit the following website for some of the guidelines:

https://www.scribbr.com/apa-style/apa-seventh-edition-changes/

Disclaimer: This subject overview is subject to change. Any changes will be discussed during lecture/meeting. Information of changes may will be provided on e-learn.

INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES

There are SEVEN (7) pages in this Assignment including the cover page.

This assignment is divided into two sections:

Section A: The Written proposal (60%) (Explained from page 1 to page 5)
Section B: The proposal presentation (40%) (Explained from page 6 to page 7)

This assignment will contribute 100% to your final grade.

IMPORTANT

Extensions and Late Submissions

The University requires students to adhere to submission deadlines for any form of assessment. Penalties applied in relation to unauthorized late submission of work are as follows:

Coursework submitted within one week after the deadline will be accepted for a maximum mark of 40%.
Any coursework handed in after seven days, without an agreed extension, will be regarded as non-submission and awarded zero.
Submission of re-sit coursework must adhere strictly to the deadline. No extension will be given, and late submissions will be awarded zero.
Subject lecturers are authorized to grant extensions for coursework within their own subjects and agreements will be documented.

RSM 5014 RESEARCH METHODS 2

SECTION A (60%)

The written assignment must be typewritten in MS Word document, font size 12, double line spacing, and A-4 size paper. Work should be submitted with a cover sheet, which includes name, subject code and title, and the assignment title.

Word limit: 4500 ± 10% words (research proposal)

Similarity index: <15%

Marks will be allocated based on the marking criteria provided in the marking guide (pages 4 to 6). Failure to adhere to the word limit will also incur mark penalties.

Through this assignment, students will propose a research proposal to address a specific area in human resource management. It is primarily concerned with designing a research proposal and an accompanying literature review and proposed methodology. In it, the research problem is clearly explained, and existing literature on related problems is reviewed in order to suggest hypotheses where relevant and propose a theoretical framework to understand the research problem. Finally, it includes a proposal to gather relevant primary and/or secondary data, as well as the tools to process and analyze data using relevant quantitative and/or qualitative techniques. The proposal will be the basis for conducting independent research for their final module, the Research Dissertation.

Students will submit 4500 words written research proposal. The allowance for the similarity index should not be more than 15%. The assignment will be assessed in accordance with the attached marking guide. Each student is also requested to submit the Turnitin report together with his/her submission.

You are to submit the full proposal to your supervisor as discussed and agreed by both of you and e-mail a copy to the lecturer as well. The proposal will be assessed based on the marking guide provided on pages 4-5.

SECTION B: PRESENTATION (40%)

The purpose of this presentation is to ensure that the major areas of a proposal have been addressed. Students are expected to present their proposals on the scheduled date(s). The presentation will be assessed in accordance with the marking guide provided on pages 6-7.

REMINDER ABOUT ACADEMIC MALPRACTICE

the verbatim copying or insertion of another’s work without clear identification and acknowledgement – including the downloading of materials from the internet without proper referencing, published or unpublished and including work of another student;
paraphrasing by, for instance, substituting a few words or phrases or altering the order of presentation of another person’s work, or linking unacknowledged sentences or phrases with words of one’s own;
unacknowledged quotation of phrases from another person’s work;
the deliberate and detailed presentation of another’s concept as one’s own;
work that has been completed, altered, translated or corrected by another person, and is submitted as if it was the student’s own work;
work that has already been published in another language, and have been translated into English by the student themselves or by another person;
direct facsimile of an image, a sound or performance without due acknowledgement of its source;
copying work that was originally completed and submitted by the student and resubmitted for another purpose, without acknowledgement of this, unless resubmission is allowed;
Collusion occurs when there is conscious collaboration, without official approval, between two or more students in the preparation and production of work which is ultimately submitted by each in an identical or substantially similar form and/or is represented by each to be the product of his or her individual efforts. Collusion includes:
unauthorised collaboration with another student in completion of work;
submission as entirely his/her own work, work done in collaboration with another person, with the intention to gain an unfair advantage;
knowingly permitting another student to copy all or part of one’s work which that student then submits as their own unaided work;
falsely claims involvement in approved and assessed group work and colludes with that group in order to deceive the lecturer or tutor.
Kindly refer to the Student Handbook for the full guidelines on academic malpractice. The “Turnitin” software is used to detect plagiarism and the University reserves the right to use this software on all submitted assignments.

DISCLOSURE OF PROVISIONAL AND FINAL MARKS

Students must take note that provisional marks are not final marks and subject to change. Final marks are released after confirmation by the Faculty Assessment Board